# Dealing with missing data using attention and latent space regularization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.07059 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.07059/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [OpenML: networked science in machine learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1407.7722/) (2014)
- [AdaBelief Optimizer: Adapting Stepsizes by the Belief in Observed Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.07468/) (2020)
- [A unifying mutual information view of metric learning: cross-entropy vs. pairwise losses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.08983/) (2020)
- [EDDI: Efficient Dynamic Discovery of High-Value Information with Partial VAE](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.11142/) (2018)
- [Fairness without Imputation: A Decision Tree Approach for Fair Prediction with Missing Values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.10431/) (2021)
- [Dropout Feature Ranking for Deep Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.08645/) (2017)
- [Establishing strong imputation performance of a denoising autoencoder in a wide range of missing data problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.02584/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Most practical data science problems encounter missing data. A wide variety of solutions exist, each with strengths and weaknesses that depend upon the missingness-generating process. Here we develop a theoretical framework for training and inference using only observed variables enabling modeling of incomplete datasets without imputation. Using an information and measure-theoretic argument we construct models with latent space representations that regularize against the potential bias introduced by missing data. The theoretical properties of this approach are demonstrated empirically using a synthetic dataset. The performance of this approach is tested on 11 benchmarking datasets with missingness and 18 datasets corrupted across three missingness patterns with comparison against a state-of-the-art model and industry-standard imputation. We show that our proposed method overcomes the weaknesses of imputation methods and outperforms the current state-of-the-art.
