# Addressing Segmentation Ambiguity in Neural Linguistic Steganography

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.06662 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.06662/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.06226/) (2018)
- [CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.00359/) (2019)
- [Neural Linguistic Steganography](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01496/) (2019)
- [Generating Steganographic Text with LSTMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.10742/) (2017)
- [Provably Secure Generative Linguistic Steganography](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.02011/) (2021)
- [Towards Near-imperceptible Steganographic Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.06679/) (2019)
- [Frustratingly Easy Edit-based Linguistic Steganography with a Masked Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09833/) (2021)
- [Near-imperceptible Neural Linguistic Steganography via Self-Adjusting Arithmetic Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.00677/) (2020)
- [Semantic-Preserving Linguistic Steganography by Pivot Translation and Semantic-Aware Bins Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.03795/) (2022)
- [Autoregressive Linguistic Steganography Based on BERT and Consistency Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.13972/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Provably Secure Disambiguating Neural Linguistic Steganography](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.17524/) (2024)
- [Addressing Tokenization Inconsistency in Steganography and Watermarking Based on Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.20718/) (2025)
- [Efficient Provably Secure Linguistic Steganography via Range Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.08052/) (2026)
- [Anchored Sliding Window: Toward Robust and Imperceptible Linguistic Steganography](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.09066/) (2026)
- [A High-Capacity and Secure Disambiguation Algorithm for Neural Linguistic Steganography](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.02332/) (2025)
- [HiTMS: A High-Throughput Multi-Stream Linguistic Steganography Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.23597/) (2026)
- [A Comprehensive Survey on Linguistic Steganography: Methods, Countermeasures, Evaluation, and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.29077/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Previous studies on neural linguistic steganography, except Ueoka et al. (2021), overlook the fact that the sender must detokenize cover texts to avoid arousing the eavesdropper's suspicion. In this paper, we demonstrate that segmentation ambiguity indeed causes occasional decoding failures at the receiver's side. With the near-ubiquity of subwords, this problem now affects any language. We propose simple tricks to overcome this problem, which are even applicable to languages without explicit word boundaries.
