# SocioProbe: What, When, and Where Language Models Learn about Sociodemographics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.04281 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.04281/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 51 of its 81 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 51)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07461/) (2018)
- [DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.03654/) (2020)
- [Language Models as Knowledge Bases?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01066/) (2019)
- [SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00537/) (2019)
- [Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02243/) (2019)
- [DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09543/) (2021)
- [BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipeline](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.05950/) (2019)
- [Aligning Books and Movies: Towards Story-like Visual Explanations by Watching Movies and Reading Books](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.06724/) (2015)
- [Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14050/) (2020)
- [A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT works](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.12327/) (2020)
- [Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03368/) (2019)
- [What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic properties](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.01070/) (2018)
- [On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.10561/) (2019)
- [Factual Probing Is [MASK]: Learning vs. Learning to Recall](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.05240/) (2021)
- [Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Length](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.12298/) (2020)
- [Measuring and Reducing Gendered Correlations in Pre-trained Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.06032/) (2020)
- [Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.04207/) (2016)
- [Sentence Encoders on STILTs: Supplementary Training on Intermediate Labeled-data Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.01088/) (2018)
- [Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.03061/) (2020)
- [Demographic Dialectal Variation in Social Media: A Case Study of African-American English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.08868/) (2016)
- [Probing Pretrained Language Models for Lexical Semantics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.05731/) (2020)
- [Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00719/) (2020)
- [Predictive Biases in Natural Language Processing Models: A Conceptual Framework and Overview](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.11078/) (2019)
- [Birds have four legs?! NumerSense: Probing Numerical Commonsense Knowledge of Pre-trained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00683/) (2020)
- [Finding Universal Grammatical Relations in Multilingual BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.04511/) (2020)
- [Probing Image-Language Transformers for Verb Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09141/) (2021)
- [Language Models as Knowledge Bases: On Entity Representations, Storage Capacity, and Paraphrased Queries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.09036/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Fairness in Language Models Beyond English: Gaps and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12578/) (2023)
- [The Call for Socially Aware Language Technologies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.02411/) (2024)
- [Has It All Been Solved? Open NLP Research Questions Not Solved by Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12544/) (2023)
- [Aligned Probing: Relating Toxic Behavior and Model Internals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.13390/) (2025)
- [Establishing Trustworthiness: Rethinking Tasks and Model Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05442/) (2023)
- [Social Perceptions of English Spelling Variation on Twitter: A Comparative Analysis of Human and LLM Responses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.23041/) (2025)
- [Probing Latent Colombian Identity Inferences in Qwen2.5-7B with Natural Language Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.21774/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Pre-trained language models (PLMs) have outperformed other NLP models on a wide range of tasks. Opting for a more thorough understanding of their capabilities and inner workings, researchers have established the extend to which they capture lower-level knowledge like grammaticality, and mid-level semantic knowledge like factual understanding. However, there is still little understanding of their knowledge of higher-level aspects of language. In particular, despite the importance of sociodemographic aspects in shaping our language, the questions of whether, where, and how PLMs encode these aspects, e.g., gender or age, is still unexplored. We address this research gap by probing the sociodemographic knowledge of different single-GPU PLMs on multiple English data sets via traditional classifier probing and information-theoretic minimum description length probing. Our results show that PLMs do encode these sociodemographics, and that this knowledge is sometimes spread across the layers of some of the tested PLMs. We further conduct a multilingual analysis and investigate the effect of supplementary training to further explore to what extent, where, and with what amount of pre-training data the knowledge is encoded. Our overall results indicate that sociodemographic knowledge is still a major challenge for NLP. PLMs require large amounts of pre-training data to acquire the knowledge and models that excel in general language understanding do not seem to own more knowledge about these aspects.