# Hardware/Software co-design with ADC-Less In-memory Computing Hardware for Spiking Neural Networks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.02167 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.02167/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2022.

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Optical flow estimation from event-based cameras and spiking neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06492/) (2023)
- [S-TLLR: STDP-inspired Temporal Local Learning Rule for Spiking Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15220/) (2023)
- [Topology Optimization of Random Memristors for Input-Aware Dynamic SNN](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18625/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) are bio-plausible models that hold great potential for realizing energy-efficient implementations of sequential tasks on resource-constrained edge devices. However, commercial edge platforms based on standard GPUs are not optimized to deploy SNNs, resulting in high energy and latency. While analog In-Memory Computing (IMC) platforms can serve as energy-efficient inference engines, they are accursed by the immense energy, latency, and area requirements of high-precision ADCs (HP-ADC), overshadowing the benefits of in-memory computations. We propose a hardware/software co-design methodology to deploy SNNs into an ADC-Less IMC architecture using sense-amplifiers as 1-bit ADCs replacing conventional HP-ADCs and alleviating the above issues. Our proposed framework incurs minimal accuracy degradation by performing hardware-aware training and is able to scale beyond simple image classification tasks to more complex sequential regression tasks. Experiments on complex tasks of optical flow estimation and gesture recognition show that progressively increasing the hardware awareness during SNN training allows the model to adapt and learn the errors due to the non-idealities associated with ADC-Less IMC. Also, the proposed ADC-Less IMC offers significant energy and latency improvements, 2-7× and 8.9-24.6×, respectively, depending on the SNN model and the workload, compared to HP-ADC IMC.
