# The Projected Covariance Measure for assumption-lean variable significance testing

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.02039 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.02039/

## Key facts

- Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2022.

## Built on by (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Practical Kernel Tests of Conditional Independence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13196/) (2024)
- [A Permutation-Free Kernel Independence Test](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09108/) (2022)
- [General Frameworks for Conditional Two-Sample Testing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16636/) (2024)
- [The Third Pillar of Causal Analysis? A Measurement Perspective on Causal Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17708/) (2025)
- [Deep Nonparametric Conditional Independence Tests for Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.06140/) (2024)
- [Locally minimax optimal confidence sets for the best model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21639/) (2025)
- [The Generalised Kernel Covariance Measure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.03721/) (2026)
- [Effect-Invariant Mechanisms for Policy Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.10983/) (2023)
- [Substitute adjustment via recovery of latent variables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00202/) (2024)
- [The Debiased Score Test: Hunt-and-test for Semiparametric Hypotheses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.28861/) (2026)
- [Embedded Conditional Independence Tests for Large Language Model Generated Text with an Application to German Parliament Speeches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.00946/) (2026)
- [AICO: Feature Significance Tests for Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.23396/) (2025)
- [GFCM: A Tail-Sensitive Mixed-Type Conditional Independence Test for Causal Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.15332/) (2026)
- [Interpreting Protein Language Model Embeddings via Orthogonal Projection for Protein Fitness Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.25548/) (2026)
- [Algorithmic stability via ensembling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.10428/) (2026)
- [Discrete Score Matching Enables Causal Discovery from Count Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.39326/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Testing the significance of a variable or group of variables X for predicting a response Y, given additional covariates Z, is a ubiquitous task in statistics. A simple but common approach is to specify a linear model, and then test whether the regression coefficient for X is non-zero. However, when the model is misspecified, the test may have poor power, for example when X is involved in complex interactions, or lead to many false rejections. In this work we study the problem of testing the model-free null of conditional mean independence, i.e. that the conditional mean of Y given X and Z does not depend on X. We propose a simple and general framework that can leverage flexible nonparametric or machine learning methods, such as additive models or random forests, to yield both robust error control and high power. The procedure involves using these methods to perform regressions, first to estimate a form of projection of Y on X and Z using one half of the data, and then to estimate the expected conditional covariance between this projection and Y on the remaining half of the data. While the approach is general, we show that a version of our procedure using spline regression achieves what we show is the minimax optimal rate in this nonparametric testing problem. Numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach both in terms of maintaining Type I error control, and power, compared to several existing approaches.