# Over-communicate no more: Situated RL agents learn concise communication protocols

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.01480 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.01480/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.06676/) (2016)
- [On the Utility of Learning about Humans for Human-AI Coordination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.05789/) (2019)
- [Emergence of Grounded Compositional Language in Multi-Agent Populations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04908/) (2017)
- [TarMAC: Targeted Multi-Agent Communication](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.11187/) (2018)
- [Emergent Multi-Agent Communication in the Deep Learning Era](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.02419/) (2020)
- [Learning when to Communicate at Scale in Multiagent Cooperative and Competitive Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.09755/) (2018)
- [Emergence of Linguistic Communication from Referential Games with Symbolic and Pixel Input](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.03984/) (2018)
- [Natural Language Does Not Emerge 'Naturally' in Multi-Agent Dialog](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.08502/) (2017)
- [On the Pitfalls of Measuring Emergent Communication](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.05168/) (2019)
- [Ease-of-Teaching and Language Structure from Emergent Communication](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02403/) (2019)
- [Emergent Communication through Negotiation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.03980/) (2018)
- [Anti-efficient encoding in emergent communication](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12561/) (2019)
- [Biases for Emergent Communication in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.05676/) (2019)
- [Efficient Communication in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Variance Based Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.02682/) (2019)
- [Talk the Walk: Navigating New York City through Grounded Dialogue](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.03367/) (2018)
- [Cooperating with Machines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06207/) (2017)
- [Compositional Obverter Communication Learning From Raw Visual Input](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.02341/) (2018)
- [Evaluating the Robustness of Collaborative Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.05507/) (2021)
- [On the role of population heterogeneity in emergent communication](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.12982/) (2022)
- ["LazImpa": Lazy and Impatient neural agents learn to communicate efficiently](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.01878/) (2020)
- [Learning to cooperate: Emergent communication in multi-agent navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.01097/) (2020)
- [Emergent Communication under Competition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.10276/) (2021)
- [Miss Tools and Mr Fruit: Emergent communication in agents learning about object affordances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11871/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [A Review of the Applications of Deep Learning-Based Emergent Communication](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.03302/) (2024)
- [Language Evolution with Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.11958/) (2024)
- [Communication-Efficient Reinforcement Learning in Swarm Robotic Networks for Maze Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17087/) (2023)
- [CoMIX: A Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning Training Architecture for Efficient Decentralized Coordination and Independent Decision-Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10721/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While it is known that communication facilitates cooperation in multi-agent settings, it is unclear how to design artificial agents that can learn to effectively and efficiently communicate with each other. Much research on communication emergence uses reinforcement learning (RL) and explores unsituated communication in one-step referential tasks -- the tasks are not temporally interactive and lack time pressures typically present in natural communication. In these settings, agents may successfully learn to communicate, but they do not learn to exchange information concisely -- they tend towards over-communication and an inefficient encoding. Here, we explore situated communication in a multi-step task, where the acting agent has to forgo an environmental action to communicate. Thus, we impose an opportunity cost on communication and mimic the real-world pressure of passing time. We compare communication emergence under this pressure against learning to communicate with a cost on articulation effort, implemented as a per-message penalty (fixed and progressively increasing). We find that while all tested pressures can disincentivise over-communication, situated communication does it most effectively and, unlike the cost on effort, does not negatively impact emergence. Implementing an opportunity cost on communication in a temporally extended environment is a step towards embodiment, and might be a pre-condition for incentivising efficient, human-like communication.
