# Curiosity-Driven Multi-Agent Exploration with Mixed Objectives

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.16468 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.16468/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02275/) (2017)
- [Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.05363/) (2017)
- [Exploration by Random Network Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.12894/) (2018)
- [Diversity is All You Need: Learning Skills without a Reward Function](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.06070/) (2018)
- [Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.08926/) (2017)
- [QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.11485/) (2018)
- [Unifying Count-Based Exploration and Intrinsic Motivation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.01868/) (2016)
- [The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.04043/) (2019)
- [Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.05296/) (2017)
- [QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.05408/) (2019)
- [#Exploration: A Study of Count-Based Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.04717/) (2016)
- [Large-Scale Study of Curiosity-Driven Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.04355/) (2018)
- [Self-Supervised Exploration via Disagreement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.04161/) (2019)
- [Emergence of Grounded Compositional Language in Multi-Agent Populations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04908/) (2017)
- [Actor-Attention-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.02912/) (2018)
- [Count-Based Exploration with Neural Density Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01310/) (2017)
- [MAVEN: Multi-Agent Variational Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.07483/) (2019)
- [RIDE: Rewarding Impact-Driven Exploration for Procedurally-Generated Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.12292/) (2020)
- [Influence-Based Multi-Agent Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.05512/) (2019)
- [Coordinated Exploration via Intrinsic Rewards for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12127/) (2019)
- [Latent World Models For Intrinsically Motivated Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02302/) (2020)
- [Exploration with Unreliable Intrinsic Reward in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02138/) (2019)
- [Intrinsic Motivation for Encouraging Synergistic Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.05189/) (2020)
- [EMI: Exploration with Mutual Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.01176/) (2018)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Curiosity-driven Exploration in Sparse-reward Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.10825/) (2023)
- [AMPED: Adaptive Multi-objective Projection for balancing Exploration and skill Diversification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05980/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Intrinsic rewards have been increasingly used to mitigate the sparse reward problem in single-agent reinforcement learning. These intrinsic rewards encourage the agent to look for novel experiences, guiding the agent to explore the environment sufficiently despite the lack of extrinsic rewards. Curiosity-driven exploration is a simple yet efficient approach that quantifies this novelty as the prediction error of the agent's curiosity module, an internal neural network that is trained to predict the agent's next state given its current state and action. We show here, however, that naively using this curiosity-driven approach to guide exploration in sparse reward cooperative multi-agent environments does not consistently lead to improved results. Straightforward multi-agent extensions of curiosity-driven exploration take into consideration either individual or collective novelty only and thus, they do not provide a distinct but collaborative intrinsic reward signal that is essential for learning in cooperative multi-agent tasks. In this work, we propose a curiosity-driven multi-agent exploration method that has the mixed objective of motivating the agents to explore the environment in ways that are individually and collectively novel. First, we develop a two-headed curiosity module that is trained to predict the corresponding agent's next observation in the first head and the next joint observation in the second head. Second, we design the intrinsic reward formula to be the sum of the individual and joint prediction errors of this curiosity module. We empirically show that the combination of our curiosity module architecture and intrinsic reward formulation guides multi-agent exploration more efficiently than baseline approaches, thereby providing the best performance boost to MARL algorithms in cooperative navigation environments with sparse rewards.