# Auto-Encoder Neural Network Incorporating X-Ray Fluorescence Fundamental Parameters with Machine Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.12239 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.12239/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [An Introduction to Variational Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02691/) (2019)
- [Theory-guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.08544/) (2016)
- [Well-tuned Simple Nets Excel on Tabular Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11189/) (2021)
- [Regularization for Deep Learning: A Taxonomy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10686/) (2017)
- [Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Raman Spectrum Recognition: A Unified Solution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.09022/) (2017)
- [Knowledge Matters: Importance of Prior Information for Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1301.4083/) (2013)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [MAX: Masked Autoencoder for X-ray Fluorescence in Geological Investigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12330/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We consider energy-dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (EDXRF) applications where the fundamental parameters method is impractical such as when instrument parameters are unavailable. For example, on a mining shovel or conveyor belt, rocks are constantly moving (leading to varying angles of incidence and distances) and there may be other factors not accounted for (like dust). Neural networks do not require instrument and fundamental parameters but training neural networks requires XRF spectra labelled with elemental composition, which is often limited because of its expense. We develop a neural network model that learns from limited labelled data and also benefits from domain knowledge by learning to invert a forward model. The forward model uses transition energies and probabilities of all elements and parameterized distributions to approximate other fundamental and instrument parameters. We evaluate the model and baseline models on a rock dataset from a lithium mineral exploration project. Our model works particularly well for some low-Z elements (Li, Mg, Al, and K) as well as some high-Z elements (Sn and Pb) despite these elements being outside the suitable range for common spectrometers to directly measure, likely owing to the ability of neural networks to learn correlations and non-linear relationships.
