# Neural Architectural Backdoors

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.12179 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.12179/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 31 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07572/) (2018)
- [DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.09055/) (2018)
- [BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.06733/) (2017)
- [Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.07012/) (2017)
- [Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.05526/) (2017)
- [Efficient Neural Architecture Search via Parameter Sharing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.03268/) (2018)
- [Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.06720/) (2019)
- [Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.00792/) (2018)
- [Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00636/) (2018)
- [STRIP: A Defence Against Trojan Attacks on Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.06531/) (2019)
- [NAS-Bench-201: Extending the Scope of Reproducible Neural Architecture Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.00326/) (2020)
- [Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.03141/) (2017)
- [Input-Aware Dynamic Backdoor Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.08138/) (2020)
- [SNAS: Stochastic Neural Architecture Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.09926/) (2018)
- [Designing Neural Network Architectures using Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.02167/) (2016)
- [Neural Architecture Search without Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04647/) (2020)
- [Progressive Differentiable Architecture Search: Bridging the Depth Gap between Search and Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.12760/) (2019)
- [Zero-Cost Proxies for Lightweight NAS](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.08134/) (2021)
- [Neural Architecture Search on ImageNet in Four GPU Hours: A Theoretically Inspired Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.11535/) (2021)
- [Demon in the Variant: Statistical Analysis of DNNs for Robust Backdoor Contamination Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.00686/) (2019)
- [NATS-Bench: Benchmarking NAS Algorithms for Architecture Topology and Size](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.00437/) (2020)
- [SGAS: Sequential Greedy Architecture Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.00195/) (2019)
- [Evaluating Efficient Performance Estimators of Neural Architectures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.03064/) (2020)
- [Model-Reuse Attacks on Deep Learning Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.00483/) (2018)
- [Towards Practical Deployment-Stage Backdoor Attack on Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.12965/) (2021)
- [TrojanZoo: Towards Unified, Holistic, and Practical Evaluation of Neural Backdoors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.09302/) (2020)
- [Architectural Backdoors in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07840/) (2022)
- [On Adversarial Robustness: A Neural Architecture Search perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.08428/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper asks the intriguing question: is it possible to exploit neural architecture search (NAS) as a new attack vector to launch previously improbable attacks? Specifically, we present EVAS, a new attack that leverages NAS to find neural architectures with inherent backdoors and exploits such vulnerability using input-aware triggers. Compared with existing attacks, EVAS demonstrates many interesting properties: (i) it does not require polluting training data or perturbing model parameters; (ii) it is agnostic to downstream fine-tuning or even re-training from scratch; (iii) it naturally evades defenses that rely on inspecting model parameters or training data. With extensive evaluation on benchmark datasets, we show that EVAS features high evasiveness, transferability, and robustness, thereby expanding the adversary's design spectrum. We further characterize the mechanisms underlying EVAS, which are possibly explainable by architecture-level ``shortcuts'' that recognize trigger patterns. This work raises concerns about the current practice of NAS and points to potential directions to develop effective countermeasures.
