# Modelling Control Arguments via Cooperation Logic in Unforeseen Scenarios

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.12114 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.12114/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 1 of its 14 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [A Journey into Ontology Approximation: From Non-Horn to Horn](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.07754/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Do intermediate feature coalitions aid explainability of black-box models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11920/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The intent of control argumentation frameworks is to specifically model strategic scenarios from the perspective of an agent by extending the standard model of argumentation framework in a way that takes unquantified uncertainty regarding arguments and attacks into account. They do not, however, adequately account for coalition formation and interactions among a set of agents in an uncertain environment. To address this challenge, we propose a formalism of a multi-agent scenario via cooperation logic and investigate agents' strategies and actions in a dynamic environment.