# Do Vision-and-Language Transformers Learn Grounded Predicate-Noun Dependencies?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.12079 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.12079/

## Key facts

- Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 39 of its 60 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2022.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 39)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.01497/) (2015)
- [Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.07332/) (2016)
- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [VQA: Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.00468/) (2015)
- [ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.02265/) (2019)
- [LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07490/) (2019)
- [VisualBERT: A Simple and Performant Baseline for Vision and Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.03557/) (2019)
- [ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.03334/) (2021)
- [Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.06165/) (2020)
- [Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14050/) (2020)
- [VL-BERT: Pre-training of Generic Visual-Linguistic Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.08530/) (2019)
- [Generation and Comprehension of Unambiguous Object Descriptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.02283/) (2015)
- [The Open Images Dataset V4: Unified image classification, object detection, and visual relationship detection at scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00982/) (2018)
- [Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.03162/) (2022)
- [A Corpus for Reasoning About Natural Language Grounded in Photographs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00491/) (2018)
- [Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.00377/) (2017)
- [Visual Relationship Detection with Language Priors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.00187/) (2016)
- [Visual7W: Grounded Question Answering in Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.03416/) (2015)
- [Women also Snowboard: Overcoming Bias in Captioning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.09797/) (2018)
- [UNITER: UNiversal Image-TExt Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.11740/) (2019)
- [Visual Semantic Role Labeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04474/) (2015)
- [Visually Grounded Reasoning across Languages and Cultures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.13238/) (2021)
- [Harms of Gender Exclusivity and Challenges in Non-Binary Representation in Language Technologies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.12084/) (2021)
- [Probing Image-Language Transformers for Verb Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09141/) (2021)
- [FOIL it! Find One mismatch between Image and Language caption](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.01359/) (2017)

## Built on by (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Measuring Progress in Fine-grained Vision-and-Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07558/) (2023)
- [Grounded Image Text Matching with Mismatched Relation Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01236/) (2023)
- [Weakly-Supervised Learning of Visual Relations in Multimodal Pretraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14281/) (2023)
- [ViPlan: A Benchmark for Visual Planning with Symbolic Predicates and Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13180/) (2025)
- [Event Extraction in Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.19537/) (2025)
- [Semantic Composition in Visually Grounded Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16328/) (2023)
- [MASS: Overcoming Language Bias in Image-Text Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.11469/) (2025)
- [Towards Human Cognition: Visual Context Guides Syntactic Priming in Fusion-Encoded Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17669/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in vision-and-language modeling have seen the development of Transformer architectures that achieve remarkable performance on multimodal reasoning tasks. Yet, the exact capabilities of these black-box models are still poorly understood. While much of previous work has focused on studying their ability to learn meaning at the word-level, their ability to track syntactic dependencies between words has received less attention. We take a first step in closing this gap by creating a new multimodal task targeted at evaluating understanding of predicate-noun dependencies in a controlled setup. We evaluate a range of state-of-the-art models and find that their performance on the task varies considerably, with some models performing relatively well and others at chance level. In an effort to explain this variability, our analyses indicate that the quality (and not only sheer quantity) of pretraining data is essential. Additionally, the best performing models leverage fine-grained multimodal pretraining objectives in addition to the standard image-text matching objectives. This study highlights that targeted and controlled evaluations are a crucial step for a precise and rigorous test of the multimodal knowledge of vision-and-language models.