# Choose Your Lenses: Flaws in Gender Bias Evaluation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11471 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11471/

## Key facts

- Cited by 29 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 53 of its 81 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 53)

- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07258/) (2021)
- [Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.06520/) (2016)
- [Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14050/) (2020)
- [StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.09456/) (2020)
- [Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.07187/) (2016)
- [CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.00133/) (2020)
- [Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.07593/) (2018)
- [Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.06876/) (2018)
- [Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03368/) (2019)
- [Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.09301/) (2018)
- [Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.09457/) (2017)
- [BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.11718/) (2021)
- [On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.10561/) (2019)
- [Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.09451/) (2019)
- [Mitigating Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing: Literature Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08976/) (2019)
- [Measuring Bias in Contextualized Word Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.07337/) (2019)
- [Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.03862/) (2019)
- [Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04508/) (2018)
- [Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Length](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.12298/) (2020)
- [Measuring and Reducing Gendered Correlations in Pre-trained Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.06032/) (2020)
- [Identifying and Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.03035/) (2019)
- [Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.03310/) (2019)
- [Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Mitigating Gender Stereotypes in Languages with Rich Morphology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.04571/) (2019)
- [Adversarial Removal of Demographic Attributes from Text Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.06640/) (2018)
- [Detecting Emergent Intersectional Biases: Contextualized Word Embeddings Contain a Distribution of Human-like Biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.03955/) (2020)
- [Reducing Gender Bias in Abusive Language Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.07231/) (2018)
- [Queens are Powerful too: Mitigating Gender Bias in Dialogue Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03842/) (2019)
- [Intrinsic Bias Metrics Do Not Correlate with Application Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.15859/) (2020)
- [Harms of Gender Exclusivity and Challenges in Non-Binary Representation in Language Technologies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.12084/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00770/) (2023)
- [Monitoring Latent World States in Language Models with Propositional Probes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19501/) (2024)
- [Shielded Representations: Protecting Sensitive Attributes Through Iterative Gradient-Based Projection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10204/) (2023)
- [Investigating Implicit Bias in Large Language Models: A Large-Scale Study of Over 50 LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12864/) (2024)
- [Can LLMs Recognize Toxicity? A Structured Investigation Framework and Toxicity Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06900/) (2024)
- [BLIND: Bias Removal With No Demographics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10563/) (2022)
- [What about em? How Commercial Machine Translation Fails to Handle (Neo-)Pronouns](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16051/) (2023)
- [Akal Badi ya Bias: An Exploratory Study of Gender Bias in Hindi Language Technology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.06346/) (2024)
- [Fairness in Language Models Beyond English: Gaps and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12578/) (2023)
- [From 'Showgirls' to 'Performers': Fine-tuning with Gender-inclusive Language for Bias Reduction in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04434/) (2024)
- [What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.00545/) (2024)
- [Women Are Beautiful, Men Are Leaders: Gender Stereotypes in Machine Translation and Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.18711/) (2023)
- [Target-Agnostic Gender-Aware Contrastive Learning for Mitigating Bias in Multilingual Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14016/) (2023)
- [Comparing Intrinsic Gender Bias Evaluation Measures without using Human Annotated Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12074/) (2023)
- [In-Depth Look at Word Filling Societal Bias Measures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12640/) (2023)
- [How far can bias go? Tracing bias from pretraining data to alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.19240/) (2024)
- [Investigating Social Bias Changes in Quantized Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06181/) (2026)
- [Undesirable Biases in NLP: Addressing Challenges of Measurement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.13709/) (2022)
- [A Group Fairness Lens for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.15478/) (2023)
- [RuBia: A Russian Language Bias Detection Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.17553/) (2024)
- [Addressing Both Statistical and Causal Gender Fairness in NLP Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00463/) (2024)
- [Leveraging Prototypical Representations for Mitigating Social Bias without Demographic Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.09516/) (2024)
- [Is Your Model Fairly Certain? Uncertainty-Aware Fairness Evaluation for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23996/) (2025)
- [Detecting and Mitigating Indirect Stereotypes in Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14574/) (2023)
- [MABR: Multilayer Adversarial Bias Removal Without Prior Bias Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.05497/) (2024)
- [Investigating the Capabilities and Limitations of Machine Learning for Identifying Bias in English Language Data with Information and Heritage Professionals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00860/) (2025)
- [GPT and Prejudice: A Sparse Approach to Understanding Learned Representations in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01252/) (2025)
- [Cross-Lingual Probing and Community-Grounded Analysis of Gender Bias in Low-Resource Bengali](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.17764/) (2026)
- [GKnow: Measuring the Entanglement of Gender Bias and Factual Gender](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12299/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Considerable efforts to measure and mitigate gender bias in recent years have led to the introduction of an abundance of tasks, datasets, and metrics used in this vein. In this position paper, we assess the current paradigm of gender bias evaluation and identify several flaws in it. First, we highlight the importance of extrinsic bias metrics that measure how a model's performance on some task is affected by gender, as opposed to intrinsic evaluations of model representations, which are less strongly connected to specific harms to people interacting with systems. We find that only a few extrinsic metrics are measured in most studies, although more can be measured. Second, we find that datasets and metrics are often coupled, and discuss how their coupling hinders the ability to obtain reliable conclusions, and how one may decouple them. We then investigate how the choice of the dataset and its composition, as well as the choice of the metric, affect bias measurement, finding significant variations across each of them. Finally, we propose several guidelines for more reliable gender bias evaluation.