# On the pitfalls of Gaussian likelihood scoring for causal discovery

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11104 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11104/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2022.

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Extremely Greedy Equivalence Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19551/) (2025)
- [Cause-Effect Inference in Location-Scale Noise Models: Maximum Likelihood vs. Independence Testing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12930/) (2023)
- [Robust Estimation of Causal Heteroscedastic Noise Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10102/) (2023)
- [Distinguishing Cause from Effect with Causal Velocity Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05122/) (2025)
- [Assessing the overall and partial causal well-specification of nonlinear additive noise models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16502/) (2023)
- [Identifying Causal Direction via Dense Functional Classes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.00538/) (2025)
- [Skewness-Robust Causal Discovery in Location-Scale Noise Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.14441/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We consider likelihood score-based methods for causal discovery in structural causal models. In particular, we focus on Gaussian scoring and analyze the effect of model misspecification in terms of non-Gaussian error distribution. We present a surprising negative result for Gaussian likelihood scoring in combination with nonparametric regression methods.
