# Latency Aware Semi-synchronous Client Selection and Model Aggregation for Wireless Federated Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.10311 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.10311/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04977/) (2019)
- [Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.06127/) (2018)
- [Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.03604/) (2018)
- [Federated Learning on Non-IID Data Silos: An Experimental Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.02079/) (2021)
- [Client Selection for Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Resources in Mobile Edge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.08333/) (2018)
- [Asynchronous Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.06952/) (2017)
- [Cooperative SGD: A unified Framework for the Design and Analysis of Communication-Efficient SGD Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.07576/) (2018)
- [Asynchronous Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Devices: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.04269/) (2021)
- [SAFA: a Semi-Asynchronous Protocol for Fast Federated Learning with Low Overhead](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01355/) (2019)
- [FedAT: A High-Performance and Communication-Efficient Federated Learning System with Asynchronous Tiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.05958/) (2020)
- [Straggler-Resilient Federated Learning: Leveraging the Interplay Between Statistical Accuracy and System Heterogeneity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.14453/) (2020)
- [Device Scheduling with Fast Convergence for Wireless Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.00856/) (2019)
- [Staleness-aware Async-SGD for Distributed Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.05950/) (2015)
- [FedAdapt: Adaptive Offloading for IoT Devices in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.04271/) (2021)
- [FLeet: Online Federated Learning via Staleness Awareness and Performance Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07273/) (2020)
- [Privacy-Preserving Asynchronous Federated Learning Algorithms for Multi-Party Vertically Collaborative Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.06233/) (2020)
- [FedAR: Activity and Resource-Aware Federated Learning Model for Distributed Mobile Robots](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.03705/) (2021)
- [Helios: Heterogeneity-Aware Federated Learning with Dynamically Balanced Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01684/) (2019)
- [Delay Minimization for Federated Learning Over Wireless Communication Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.03462/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [SyncFed: Time-Aware Federated Learning through Explicit Timestamping and Synchronization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09660/) (2025)
- [Federated Learning Model Aggregation in Heterogenous Aerial and Space Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16351/) (2023)
- [Navigating High-Degree Heterogeneity: Federated Learning in Aerial and Space Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17951/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning (FL) is a collaborative machine learning framework that requires different clients (e.g., Internet of Things devices) to participate in the machine learning model training process by training and uploading their local models to an FL server in each global iteration. Upon receiving the local models from all the clients, the FL server generates a global model by aggregating the received local models. This traditional FL process may suffer from the straggler problem in heterogeneous client settings, where the FL server has to wait for slow clients to upload their local models in each global iteration, thus increasing the overall training time. One of the solutions is to set up a deadline and only the clients that can upload their local models before the deadline would be selected in the FL process. This solution may lead to a slow convergence rate and global model overfitting issues due to the limited client selection. In this paper, we propose the Latency awarE Semi-synchronous client Selection and mOdel aggregation for federated learNing (LESSON) method that allows all the clients to participate in the whole FL process but with different frequencies. That is, faster clients would be scheduled to upload their models more frequently than slow clients, thus resolving the straggler problem and accelerating the convergence speed, while avoiding model overfitting. Also, LESSON is capable of adjusting the tradeoff between the model accuracy and convergence rate by varying the deadline. Extensive simulations have been conducted to compare the performance of LESSON with the other two baseline methods, i.e., FedAvg and FedCS. The simulation results demonstrate that LESSON achieves faster convergence speed than FedAvg and FedCS, and higher model accuracy than FedCS.