# A Practical, Progressively-Expressive GNN

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.09521 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09521/

## Key facts

- Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 49 of its 70 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 49)

- [Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.02907/) (2016)
- [Graph Attention Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10903/) (2017)
- [How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.00826/) (2018)
- [Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.01212/) (2017)
- [A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.00596/) (2019)
- [Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.02428/) (2019)
- [Deep Sets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06114/) (2017)
- [Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.01261/) (2018)
- [MoleculeNet: A Benchmark for Molecular Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.00564/) (2017)
- [Predict then Propagate: Graph Neural Networks meet Personalized PageRank](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.05997/) (2018)
- [Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12265/) (2019)
- [Weisfeiler and Leman Go Neural: Higher-order Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.02244/) (2018)
- [Benchmarking Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.00982/) (2020)
- [On the Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks and its Practical Implications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.05205/) (2020)
- [Measuring and Relieving the Over-smoothing Problem for Graph Neural Networks from the Topological View](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03211/) (2019)
- [Graph Neural Networks in Recommender Systems: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.02260/) (2020)
- [Principal Neighbourhood Aggregation for Graph Nets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05718/) (2020)
- [Understanding over-squashing and bottlenecks on graphs via curvature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.14522/) (2021)
- [Provably Powerful Graph Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11136/) (2019)
- [Improving Graph Neural Network Expressivity via Subgraph Isomorphism Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09252/) (2020)
- [PairNorm: Tackling Oversmoothing in GNNs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.12223/) (2019)
- [SIGN: Scalable Inception Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.11198/) (2020)
- [Can Graph Neural Networks Count Substructures?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.04025/) (2020)
- [Generalization and Representational Limits of Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.06157/) (2020)
- [Weisfeiler and Lehman Go Cellular: CW Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.12575/) (2021)
- [Position-aware Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.04817/) (2019)
- [What graph neural networks cannot learn: depth vs width](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.03199/) (2019)
- [The Surprising Power of Graph Neural Networks with Random Node Initialization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.01179/) (2020)
- [Identity-aware Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.10320/) (2021)
- [Pure Transformers are Powerful Graph Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.02505/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [A Complete Expressiveness Hierarchy for Subgraph GNNs via Subgraph Weisfeiler-Lehman Tests](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07090/) (2023)
- [Beyond Weisfeiler-Lehman: A Quantitative Framework for GNN Expressiveness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08514/) (2024)
- [Equivariant Polynomials for Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.11556/) (2023)
- [An Empirical Study of Realized GNN Expressiveness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07702/) (2023)
- [Pard: Permutation-Invariant Autoregressive Diffusion for Graph Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03687/) (2024)
- [Is Distance Matrix Enough for Geometric Deep Learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05743/) (2023)
- [Extending the Design Space of Graph Neural Networks by Rethinking Folklore Weisfeiler-Lehman](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03266/) (2023)
- [Rethinking the Capacity of Graph Neural Networks for Branching Strategy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07099/) (2024)
- [MAG-GNN: Reinforcement Learning Boosted Graph Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19142/) (2023)
- [Descriptive Kernel Convolution Network with Improved Random Walk Kernel](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06087/) (2024)
- [Demystifying Higher-Order Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12841/) (2024)
- [Foundations and Frontiers of Graph Learning Theory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.03125/) (2024)
- [Permutation-Invariant Graph Partitioning:How Graph Neural Networks Capture Structural Interactions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08671/) (2023)
- [Weisfeiler-Leman Features for Planning: A 1,000,000 Sample Size Hyperparameter Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18515/) (2025)
- [Fine-Grained Expressive Power of Weisfeiler-Leman: A Homomorphism Counting Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03517/) (2024)
- [Message Detouring: A Simple Yet Effective Cycle Representation for Expressive Graph Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.08085/) (2024)
- [Graph Learning for Planning: The Story Thus Far and Open Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.02136/) (2024)
- [Message Passing on the Edge: Towards Scalable and Expressive GNNs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13615/) (2025)
- [Plain Transformers are Surprisingly Powerful Link Predictors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.01553/) (2026)
- [Invariant-Stratified Propagation for Expressive Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.01388/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Message passing neural networks (MPNNs) have become a dominant flavor of graph neural networks (GNNs) in recent years. Yet, MPNNs come with notable limitations; namely, they are at most as powerful as the 1-dimensional Weisfeiler-Leman (1-WL) test in distinguishing graphs in a graph isomorphism testing frame-work. To this end, researchers have drawn inspiration from the k-WL hierarchy to develop more expressive GNNs. However, current k-WL-equivalent GNNs are not practical for even small values of k, as k-WL becomes combinatorially more complex as k grows. At the same time, several works have found great empirical success in graph learning tasks without highly expressive models, implying that chasing expressiveness with a coarse-grained ruler of expressivity like k-WL is often unneeded in practical tasks. To truly understand the expressiveness-complexity tradeoff, one desires a more fine-grained ruler, which can more gradually increase expressiveness. Our work puts forth such a proposal: Namely, we first propose the (k, c)(<=)-SETWL hierarchy with greatly reduced complexity from k-WL, achieved by moving from k-tuples of nodes to sets with <=k nodes defined over <=c connected components in the induced original graph. We show favorable theoretical results for this model in relation to k-WL, and concretize it via (k, c)(<=)-SETGNN, which is as expressive as (k, c)(<=)-SETWL. Our model is practical and progressively-expressive, increasing in power with k and c. We demonstrate effectiveness on several benchmark datasets, achieving several state-of-the-art results with runtime and memory usage applicable to practical graphs. We open source our implementation at https://github.com/LingxiaoShawn/KCSetGNN.