# Eliciting Compatible Demonstrations for Multi-Human Imitation Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.08073 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08073/

## Key facts

- Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Robot manipulation imitation learning, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data.
- Builds on 30 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2022.

## Placed in

- Offline RL and imitation learning from data / [Robot manipulation imitation learning](https://mlsanity.com/offlinerl/robot-manipulation-imitation-learning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 30)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Layer Normalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.06450/) (2016)
- [Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.08415/) (2016)
- [Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.01691/) (2022)
- [Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.00177/) (2019)
- [What Matters in Learning from Offline Human Demonstrations for Robot Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.03298/) (2021)
- [BC-Z: Zero-Shot Task Generalization with Robotic Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.02005/) (2022)
- [Implicit Behavioral Cloning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00137/) (2021)
- [Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.10795/) (2020)
- [Learning Latent Plans from Play](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.01973/) (2019)
- [Critic Regularized Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.15134/) (2020)
- [HG-DAgger: Interactive Imitation Learning with Human Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.02890/) (2018)
- [Extrapolating Beyond Suboptimal Demonstrations via Inverse Reinforcement Learning from Observations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.06387/) (2019)
- [Bridge Data: Boosting Generalization of Robotic Skills with Cross-Domain Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.13396/) (2021)
- [RvS: What is Essential for Offline RL via Supervised Learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10751/) (2021)
- [ThriftyDAgger: Budget-Aware Novelty and Risk Gating for Interactive Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.08273/) (2021)
- [EnsembleDAgger: A Bayesian Approach to Safe Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.08364/) (2018)
- [Query-Efficient Imitation Learning for End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.06450/) (2016)
- [Learning from Suboptimal Demonstration via Self-Supervised Reward Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11723/) (2020)
- [Bottom-Up Skill Discovery from Unsegmented Demonstrations for Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.13841/) (2021)
- [Multi-Modal Imitation Learning from Unstructured Demonstrations using Generative Adversarial Nets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.10479/) (2017)
- [Mind Your Outliers! Investigating the Negative Impact of Outliers on Active Learning for Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.02331/) (2021)
- [LazyDAgger: Reducing Context Switching in Interactive Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.00053/) (2021)
- [Imitation Learning by Estimating Expertise of Demonstrators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.01288/) (2022)
- [Confidence-Aware Imitation Learning from Demonstrations with Varying Optimality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14754/) (2021)
- [Learning Multimodal Rewards from Rankings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.12750/) (2021)
- [TRAIL: Near-Optimal Imitation Learning with Suboptimal Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14770/) (2021)
- [Burn-In Demonstrations for Multi-Modal Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.05090/) (2017)
- [A Closer Look at Advantage-Filtered Behavioral Cloning in High-Noise Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.04698/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Robot Learning on the Job: Human-in-the-Loop Autonomy and Learning During Deployment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.08416/) (2022)
- [Data Quality in Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.02437/) (2023)
- [Behavior Retrieval: Few-Shot Imitation Learning by Querying Unlabeled Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08742/) (2023)
- [HYDRA: Hybrid Robot Actions for Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17237/) (2023)
- [Bidirectional Decoding: Improving Action Chunking via Guided Test-Time Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.17355/) (2024)
- [Re-Mix: Optimizing Data Mixtures for Large Scale Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.14037/) (2024)
- [CUPID: Curating Data your Robot Loves with Influence Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19121/) (2025)
- [So You Think You Can Scale Up Autonomous Robot Data Collection?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.01813/) (2024)
- [Learning to Discern: Imitating Heterogeneous Human Demonstrations with Preference and Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14196/) (2023)
- [Guiding Data Collection via Factored Scaling Curves](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.07728/) (2025)
- [How to Train Your Robots? The Impact of Demonstration Modality on Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07017/) (2025)
- [SCIZOR: A Self-Supervised Approach to Data Curation for Large-Scale Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22626/) (2025)
- [Consistency Matters: Defining Demonstration Data Quality Metrics in Robot Learning from Demonstration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14309/) (2024)
- [Generating Language Corrections for Teaching Physical Control Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07012/) (2023)
- [IIFL: Implicit Interactive Fleet Learning from Heterogeneous Human Supervisors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15228/) (2023)
- [Counterfactual Behavior Cloning: Offline Imitation Learning from Imperfect Human Demonstrations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.10760/) (2025)
- [DIDA: Denoised Imitation Learning based on Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03382/) (2024)
- [ATHENA: Accelerated Multi-Task Heterogeneous Influence Functions for Robot Data Curation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.16208/) (2026)
- [Behavior Uncloning: Distilling Mode Redirection into Policy Weights without Inference-Time Steering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.29201/) (2026)
- [Going Beyond Expert Performance via Deep Implicit Imitation Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.03616/) (2025)
- [Improving Robotic Imitation Learning via Trajectory Standardization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.22907/) (2026)
- [Imperfection for Precision: Upcycling Imperfect Data for High-Precision Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.26672/) (2026)
- [I3L: Iterative Interactive Imitation Learning for Whole-Body Mobile Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.17748/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Imitation learning from human-provided demonstrations is a strong approach for learning policies for robot manipulation. While the ideal dataset for imitation learning is homogenous and low-variance -- reflecting a single, optimal method for performing a task -- natural human behavior has a great deal of heterogeneity, with several optimal ways to demonstrate a task. This multimodality is inconsequential to human users, with task variations manifesting as subconscious choices; for example, reaching down, then across to grasp an object, versus reaching across, then down. Yet, this mismatch presents a problem for interactive imitation learning, where sequences of users improve on a policy by iteratively collecting new, possibly conflicting demonstrations. To combat this problem of demonstrator incompatibility, this work designs an approach for 1) measuring the compatibility of a new demonstration given a base policy, and 2) actively eliciting more compatible demonstrations from new users. Across two simulation tasks requiring long-horizon, dexterous manipulation and a real-world "food plating" task with a Franka Emika Panda arm, we show that we can both identify incompatible demonstrations via post-hoc filtering, and apply our compatibility measure to actively elicit compatible demonstrations from new users, leading to improved task success rates across simulated and real environments.