# Rethinking Annotation: Can Language Learners Contribute?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.06828 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06828/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07461/) (2018)
- [mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11934/) (2020)
- [The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.09095/) (2020)
- [TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.05002/) (2020)
- [Quality at a Glance: An Audit of Web-Crawled Multilingual Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12028/) (2021)
- [KLUE: Korean Language Understanding Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.09680/) (2021)
- [IndoNLU: Benchmark and Resources for Evaluating Indonesian Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.05387/) (2020)
- [IndoLEM and IndoBERT: A Benchmark Dataset and Pre-trained Language Model for Indonesian NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.00677/) (2020)
- [IndoNLI: A Natural Language Inference Dataset for Indonesian](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14566/) (2021)
- [Building Low-Resource NER Models Using Non-Speaker Annotation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09627/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [How Annotation Trains Annotators: Competence Development in Social Influence Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.02951/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Researchers have traditionally recruited native speakers to provide annotations for widely used benchmark datasets. However, there are languages for which recruiting native speakers can be difficult, and it would help to find learners of those languages to annotate the data. In this paper, we investigate whether language learners can contribute annotations to benchmark datasets. In a carefully controlled annotation experiment, we recruit 36 language learners, provide two types of additional resources (dictionaries and machine-translated sentences), and perform mini-tests to measure their language proficiency. We target three languages, English, Korean, and Indonesian, and the four NLP tasks of sentiment analysis, natural language inference, named entity recognition, and machine reading comprehension. We find that language learners, especially those with intermediate or advanced levels of language proficiency, are able to provide fairly accurate labels with the help of additional resources. Moreover, we show that data annotation improves learners' language proficiency in terms of vocabulary and grammar. One implication of our findings is that broadening the annotation task to include language learners can open up the opportunity to build benchmark datasets for languages for which it is difficult to recruit native speakers.
