# Sociotechnical Harms of Algorithmic Systems: Scoping a Taxonomy for Harm Reduction

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.05791 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.05791/

## Key facts

- Cited by 138 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2022.

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 138)

- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [PaLM 2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10403/) (2023)
- [Sociotechnical Safety Evaluation of Generative AI Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11986/) (2023)
- [Auditing large language models: a three-layered approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08500/) (2023)
- [Evaluating the Social Impact of Generative AI Systems in Systems and Society](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05949/) (2023)
- [Personalisation within bounds: A risk taxonomy and policy framework for the alignment of large language models with personalised feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.05453/) (2023)
- [Visibility into AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.13138/) (2024)
- ["I'm Not Sure, But...": Examining the Impact of Large Language Models' Uncertainty Expression on User Reliance and Trust](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.00623/) (2024)
- [AI Suggestions Homogenize Writing Toward Western Styles and Diminish Cultural Nuances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.11360/) (2024)
- [AART: AI-Assisted Red-Teaming with Diverse Data Generation for New LLM-powered Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08592/) (2023)
- [Why human-AI relationships need socioaffective alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.02528/) (2025)
- [A Toolbox for Surfacing Health Equity Harms and Biases in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.12025/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Personalized Alignment -- The Missing Piece for Large Language Models in Real-World Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17003/) (2025)
- [AI Safety in Generative AI Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18369/) (2024)
- [Open-Sourcing Highly Capable Foundation Models: An evaluation of risks, benefits, and alternative methods for pursuing open-source objectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09227/) (2023)
- [Towards interactive evaluations for interaction harms in human-AI systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.10632/) (2024)
- [Farsight: Fostering Responsible AI Awareness During AI Application Prototyping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.15350/) (2024)
- ['Simulacrum of Stories': Examining Large Language Models as Qualitative Research Participants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19430/) (2024)
- [OpenAI's Approach to External Red Teaming for AI Models and Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16431/) (2025)
- [ViSAGe: A Global-Scale Analysis of Visual Stereotypes in Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06310/) (2024)
- [From Lived Experience to Insight: Unpacking the Psychological Risks of Using AI Conversational Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.07951/) (2024)
- [SeeGULL Multilingual: a Dataset of Geo-Culturally Situated Stereotypes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05696/) (2024)
- [Lessons From Red Teaming 100 Generative AI Products](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.07238/) (2025)
- [Summon a Demon and Bind it: A Grounded Theory of LLM Red Teaming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.06237/) (2023)
- [Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.06753/) (2022)
- [Rejected Dialects: Biases Against African American Language in Reward Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12858/) (2025)
- [Mapping the Ethics of Generative AI: A Comprehensive Scoping Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.08323/) (2024)
- [Holistic Safety and Responsibility Evaluations of Advanced AI Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14068/) (2024)
- [A Collaborative, Human-Centred Taxonomy of AI, Algorithmic, and Automation Harms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01294/) (2024)
- [Reality Check: A New Evaluation Ecosystem Is Necessary to Understand AI's Real World Effects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18893/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding the landscape of potential harms from algorithmic systems enables practitioners to better anticipate consequences of the systems they build. It also supports the prospect of incorporating controls to help minimize harms that emerge from the interplay of technologies and social and cultural dynamics. A growing body of scholarship has identified a wide range of harms across different algorithmic technologies. However, computing research and practitioners lack a high level and synthesized overview of harms from algorithmic systems. Based on a scoping review of computing research (n=172), we present an applied taxonomy of sociotechnical harms to support a more systematic surfacing of potential harms in algorithmic systems. The final taxonomy builds on and refers to existing taxonomies, classifications, and terminologies. Five major themes related to sociotechnical harms - representational, allocative, quality-of-service, interpersonal harms, and social system/societal harms - and sub-themes are presented along with a description of these categories. We conclude with a discussion of challenges and opportunities for future research.