# How Well Do Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Models Understand Date Information?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.05208 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.05208/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 15 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2022.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/knowledge-and-tool-augmented-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Steps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.01060/) (2020)
- [MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Composition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00573/) (2021)
- [DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.00161/) (2019)
- [Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.06481/) (2017)
- [Multi-hop Reading Comprehension through Question Decomposition and Rescoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02916/) (2019)
- [Compositional Questions Do Not Necessitate Multi-hop Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02900/) (2019)
- [Hierarchical Graph Network for Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03631/) (2019)
- [Avoiding Reasoning Shortcuts: Adversarial Evaluation, Training, and Model Development for Multi-Hop QA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.07132/) (2019)
- [NumNet: Machine Reading Comprehension with Numerical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.06701/) (2019)
- [Multi-hop Reading Comprehension across Multiple Documents by Reasoning over Heterogeneous Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07374/) (2019)
- [Understanding Dataset Design Choices for Multi-hop Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.12106/) (2019)
- [R4C: A Benchmark for Evaluating RC Systems to Get the Right Answer for the Right Reason](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.04601/) (2019)
- [Do Multi-Hop Question Answering Systems Know How to Answer the Single-Hop Sub-Questions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09919/) (2020)
- [Break, Perturb, Build: Automatic Perturbation of Reasoning Paths Through Question Decomposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.13935/) (2021)
- [Numerical reasoning in machine reading comprehension tasks: are we there yet?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.08207/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Analyzing the Effectiveness of the Underlying Reasoning Tasks in Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05963/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Several multi-hop reading comprehension datasets have been proposed to resolve the issue of reasoning shortcuts by which questions can be answered without performing multi-hop reasoning. However, the ability of multi-hop models to perform step-by-step reasoning when finding an answer to a comparison question remains unclear. It is also unclear how questions about the internal reasoning process are useful for training and evaluating question-answering (QA) systems. To evaluate the model precisely in a hierarchical manner, we first propose a dataset, textitHieraDate, with three probing tasks in addition to the main question: extraction, reasoning, and robustness. Our dataset is created by enhancing two previous multi-hop datasets, HotpotQA and 2WikiMultiHopQA, focusing on multi-hop questions on date information that involve both comparison and numerical reasoning. We then evaluate the ability of existing models to understand date information. Our experimental results reveal that the multi-hop models do not have the ability to subtract two dates even when they perform well in date comparison and number subtraction tasks. Other results reveal that our probing questions can help to improve the performance of the models (e.g., by +10.3 F1) on the main QA task and our dataset can be used for data augmentation to improve the robustness of the models.