# FedDef: Defense Against Gradient Leakage in Federated Learning-based Network Intrusion Detection Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.04052 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.04052/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 29 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.04644/) (2016)
- [Deep Learning with Differential Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.00133/) (2016)
- [Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05492/) (2016)
- [Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.01690/) (2020)
- [DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.04599/) (2015)
- [On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.02189/) (2019)
- [Deep Leakage from Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08935/) (2019)
- [Membership Inference Attacks From First Principles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03570/) (2021)
- [Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.14053/) (2020)
- [Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04049/) (2018)
- [iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.02610/) (2020)
- [Beyond Inferring Class Representatives: User-Level Privacy Leakage From Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.00535/) (2018)
- [Torchattacks: A PyTorch Repository for Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.01950/) (2020)
- [When the Curious Abandon Honesty: Federated Learning Is Not Private](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.02918/) (2021)
- [Kitsune: An Ensemble of Autoencoders for Online Network Intrusion Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.09089/) (2018)
- [Provable Defense against Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning from Representation Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.06043/) (2020)
- [InstaHide: Instance-hiding Schemes for Private Distributed Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02772/) (2020)
- [D"IoT: A Federated Self-learning Anomaly Detection System for IoT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07474/) (2018)
- [Deep Anomaly Detection for Time-series Data in Industrial IoT: A Communication-Efficient On-device Federated Learning Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.09712/) (2020)
- [Are Your Sensitive Attributes Private? Novel Model Inversion Attribute Inference Attacks on Classification Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.09370/) (2022)
- [Privacy-preserving Collaborative Learning with Automatic Transformation Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.12505/) (2020)
- [Evaluating and Improving Adversarial Robustness of Machine Learning-Based Network Intrusion Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.07519/) (2020)
- [An Accuracy-Lossless Perturbation Method for Defending Privacy Attacks in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09843/) (2020)
- [TANTRA: Timing-Based Adversarial Network Traffic Reshaping Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06297/) (2021)
- [Concealing Sensitive Samples against Gradient Leakage in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.05724/) (2022)
- [An Interpretable Federated Learning-based Network Intrusion Detection Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.03134/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Defending Against Data Reconstruction Attacks in Federated Learning: An Information Theory Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.01268/) (2024)
- [Model Inversion Attack against Federated Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14558/) (2025)
- [On the Security and Privacy of Federated Learning: A Survey with Attacks, Defenses, Frameworks, Applications, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.13730/) (2025)
- [An Evaluation Framework for Network IDS/IPS Datasets: Leveraging MITRE ATT&CK and Industry Relevance Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.12743/) (2025)
- [Behavior-Aware and Generalizable Defense Against Black-Box Adversarial Attacks for ML-Based IDS](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.13501/) (2025)
- [From Data Heterogeneity to Convergence: A Data-Centric Review of Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.10595/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning (DL) methods have been widely applied to anomaly-based network intrusion detection system (NIDS) to detect malicious traffic. To expand the usage scenarios of DL-based methods, federated learning (FL) allows multiple users to train a global model on the basis of respecting individual data privacy. However, it has not yet been systematically evaluated how robust FL-based NIDSs are against existing privacy attacks under existing defenses. To address this issue, we propose two privacy evaluation metrics designed for FL-based NIDSs, including (1) privacy score that evaluates the similarity between the original and recovered traffic features using reconstruction attacks, and (2) evasion rate against NIDSs using adversarial attack with the recovered traffic. We conduct experiments to illustrate that existing defenses provide little protection and the corresponding adversarial traffic can even evade the SOTA NIDS Kitsune. To defend against such attacks and build a more robust FL-based NIDS, we further propose FedDef, a novel optimization-based input perturbation defense strategy with theoretical guarantee. It achieves both high utility by minimizing the gradient distance and strong privacy protection by maximizing the input distance. We experimentally evaluate four existing defenses on four datasets and show that our defense outperforms all the baselines in terms of privacy protection with up to 7 times higher privacy score, while maintaining model accuracy loss within 3% under optimal parameter combination.