# FedMT: Federated Learning with Mixed-type Labels

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02042 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02042/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 60 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.09412/) (2017)
- [MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.04381/) (2018)
- [Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04977/) (2019)
- [Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.06127/) (2018)
- [Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07572/) (2018)
- [RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.13719/) (2019)
- [FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.07685/) (2020)
- [On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.02189/) (2019)
- [Adaptive Federated Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.00295/) (2020)
- [An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.04747/) (2016)
- [Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.06720/) (2019)
- [Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.03683/) (2016)
- [On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Net](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.11955/) (2019)
- [FedBN: Federated Learning on Non-IID Features via Local Batch Normalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.07623/) (2021)
- [Exploiting Shared Representations for Personalized Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.07078/) (2021)
- [Improving Federated Learning Personalization via Model Agnostic Meta Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.12488/) (2019)
- [Tighter Theory for Local SGD on Identical and Heterogeneous Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.04746/) (2019)
- [Evaluating Deep Neural Networks Trained on Clinical Images in Dermatology with the Fitzpatrick 17k Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09957/) (2021)
- [Meta-Baseline: Exploring Simple Meta-Learning for Few-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.04390/) (2020)
- [FetchSGD: Communication-Efficient Federated Learning with Sketching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.07682/) (2020)
- [Graph Neural Tangent Kernel: Fusing Graph Neural Networks with Graph Kernels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13192/) (2019)
- [Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07805/) (2020)
- [Federated Semi-Supervised Learning with Inter-Client Consistency & Disjoint Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.12097/) (2020)
- [The Recurrent Neural Tangent Kernel](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.10246/) (2020)
- [Learning Noise Transition Matrix from Only Noisy Labels via Total Variation Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.02414/) (2021)
- [Federated Learning with Only Positive Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.10342/) (2020)
- [SemiFL: Semi-Supervised Federated Learning for Unlabeled Clients with Alternate Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01432/) (2021)
- [Grafit: Learning fine-grained image representations with coarse labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.12982/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In federated learning (FL), classifiers (e.g., deep networks) are trained on datasets from multiple data centers without exchanging data across them, which improves the sample efficiency. However, the conventional FL setting assumes the same labeling criterion in all data centers involved, thus limiting its practical utility. This limitation becomes particularly notable in domains like disease diagnosis, where different clinical centers may adhere to different standards, making traditional FL methods unsuitable. This paper addresses this important yet under-explored setting of FL, namely FL with mixed-type labels, where the allowance of different labeling criteria introduces inter-center label space differences. To address this challenge effectively and efficiently, we introduce a model-agnostic approach called FedMT, which estimates label space correspondences and projects classification scores to construct loss functions. The proposed FedMT is versatile and integrates seamlessly with various FL methods, such as FedAvg. Experimental results on benchmark and medical datasets highlight the substantial improvement in classification accuracy achieved by FedMT in the presence of mixed-type labels.