# COMPS: Conceptual Minimal Pair Sentences for testing Robust Property Knowledge and its Inheritance in Pre-trained Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.01963 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01963/

## Key facts

- Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 45 of its 90 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 45)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01108/) (2019)
- [ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.11942/) (2019)
- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00027/) (2020)
- [Language Models as Knowledge Bases?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01066/) (2019)
- [Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10625/) (2022)
- [Aligning Books and Movies: Towards Story-like Visual Explanations by Watching Movies and Reading Books](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.06724/) (2015)
- [Show Your Work: Scratchpads for Intermediate Computation with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.00114/) (2021)
- [Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12452/) (2021)
- [Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03368/) (2019)
- [BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.00582/) (2019)
- [How Can We Know When Language Models Know? On the Calibration of Language Models for Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.00955/) (2020)
- [Measuring and Improving Consistency in Pretrained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01017/) (2021)
- [Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn't Always Right](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08315/) (2021)
- [Can language models learn from explanations in context?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02329/) (2022)
- [Negated and Misprimed Probes for Pretrained Language Models: Birds Can Talk, But Cannot Fly](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03343/) (2019)
- [Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.09031/) (2018)
- [A Simple Method for Commonsense Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.02847/) (2018)
- [Language models show human-like content effects on reasoning tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.07051/) (2022)
- [Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00719/) (2020)
- [Neural Language Models as Psycholinguistic Subjects: Representations of Syntactic State](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.03260/) (2019)
- [Causal Analysis of Syntactic Agreement Mechanisms in Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06087/) (2021)
- [Can Language Models Encode Perceptual Structure Without Grounding? A Case Study in Color](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.06129/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00093/) (2023)
- [Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01558/) (2023)
- [Inverse Scaling: When Bigger Isn't Better](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09479/) (2023)
- [Elements of World Knowledge (EWoK): A Cognition-Inspired Framework for Evaluating Basic World Knowledge in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.09605/) (2024)
- [Language model acceptability judgements are not always robust to context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08979/) (2022)
- [The Factuality of Large Language Models in the Legal Domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.11798/) (2024)
- [Vision-and-Language Training Helps Deploy Taxonomic Knowledge but Does Not Fundamentally Alter It](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.13328/) (2025)
- [Beyond Recognition: Evaluating Visual Perspective Taking in Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.03821/) (2025)
- [AI-enhanced semantic feature norms for 786 concepts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.10718/) (2025)
- [From Chains to DAGs: Probing the Graph Structure of Reasoning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.17593/) (2026)
- [ACCORD: Closing the Commonsense Measurability Gap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.02804/) (2024)
- [Bridging Reasoning to Learning: Unmasking Illusions using Complexity Out of Distribution Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06274/) (2025)
- [Topoformer: brain-like topographic organization in Transformer language models through spatial querying and reweighting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.18745/) (2025)
- [Multimodal QUD: Inquisitive Questions from Scientific Figures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.23733/) (2026)
- [Grammatical "grandmother neurons" are rare in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.29328/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

A characteristic feature of human semantic cognition is its ability to not only store and retrieve the properties of concepts observed through experience, but to also facilitate the inheritance of properties (can breathe) from superordinate concepts (animal) to their subordinates (dog) -- i.e. demonstrate property inheritance. In this paper, we present COMPS, a collection of minimal pair sentences that jointly tests pre-trained language models (PLMs) on their ability to attribute properties to concepts and their ability to demonstrate property inheritance behavior. Analyses of 22 different PLMs on COMPS reveal that they can easily distinguish between concepts on the basis of a property when they are trivially different, but find it relatively difficult when concepts are related on the basis of nuanced knowledge representations. Furthermore, we find that PLMs can demonstrate behavior consistent with property inheritance to a great extent, but fail in the presence of distracting information, which decreases the performance of many models, sometimes even below chance. This lack of robustness in demonstrating simple reasoning raises important questions about PLMs' capacity to make correct inferences even when they appear to possess the prerequisite knowledge.