# Gender Bias in Fake News: An Analysis

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.11984 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.11984/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 3 of its 14 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- ["Liar, Liar Pants on Fire": A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.00648/) (2017)
- [FakeNewsNet: A Data Repository with News Content, Social Context and Spatialtemporal Information for Studying Fake News on Social Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.01286/) (2018)
- [A Stylometric Inquiry into Hyperpartisan and Fake News](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.05638/) (2017)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Data science research into fake news has gathered much momentum in recent years, arguably facilitated by the emergence of large public benchmark datasets. While it has been well-established within media studies that gender bias is an issue that pervades news media, there has been very little exploration into the relationship between gender bias and fake news. In this work, we provide the first empirical analysis of gender bias vis-a-vis fake news, leveraging simple and transparent lexicon-based methods over public benchmark datasets. Our analysis establishes the increased prevalance of gender bias in fake news across three facets viz., abundance, affect and proximal words. The insights from our analysis provide a strong argument that gender bias needs to be an important consideration in research into fake news.