# A model-agnostic approach for generating Saliency Maps to explain inferred decisions of Deep Learning Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.08906 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.08906/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.04381/) (2018)
- [Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01365/) (2017)
- [Sanity Checks for Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.03292/) (2018)
- [A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.01933/) (2018)
- [Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.11063/) (2017)
- [RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07421/) (2018)
- [The (Un)reliability of saliency methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00867/) (2017)
- [Full-Gradient Representation for Neural Network Visualization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00780/) (2019)
- [Benchmarking and Survey of Explanation Methods for Black Box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.13076/) (2021)
- [Improving performance of deep learning models with axiomatic attribution priors and expected gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.10670/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The widespread use of black-box AI models has raised the need for algorithms and methods that explain the decisions made by these models. In recent years, the AI research community is increasingly interested in models' explainability since black-box models take over more and more complicated and challenging tasks. Explainability becomes critical considering the dominance of deep learning techniques for a wide range of applications, including but not limited to computer vision. In the direction of understanding the inference process of deep learning models, many methods that provide human comprehensible evidence for the decisions of AI models have been developed, with the vast majority relying their operation on having access to the internal architecture and parameters of these models (e.g., the weights of neural networks). We propose a model-agnostic method for generating saliency maps that has access only to the output of the model and does not require additional information such as gradients. We use Differential Evolution (DE) to identify which image pixels are the most influential in a model's decision-making process and produce class activation maps (CAMs) whose quality is comparable to the quality of CAMs created with model-specific algorithms. DE-CAM achieves good performance without requiring access to the internal details of the model's architecture at the cost of more computational complexity.