# Entity-based Claim Representation Improves Fact-Checking of Medical Content in Tweets

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07834 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.07834/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14974/) (2020)
- [A Survey on Automated Fact-Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.11896/) (2021)
- [Explainable Automated Fact-Checking for Public Health Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.09926/) (2020)
- [The Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER) Shared Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.10971/) (2018)
- [COVID-Fact: Fact Extraction and Verification of Real-World Claims on COVID-19 Pandemic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.03794/) (2021)
- [Automated Fact Checking: Task formulations, methods and future directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07687/) (2018)
- [UKP-Athene: Multi-Sentence Textual Entailment for Claim Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.01479/) (2018)
- [Generating Scientific Claims for Zero-Shot Scientific Fact Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.12990/) (2022)
- [Language Models as Fact Checkers?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04102/) (2020)
- [Scientific Claim Verification with VERT5ERINI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11930/) (2020)
- [Zero-shot Fact Verification by Claim Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.14682/) (2021)
- [What is the Essence of a Claim? Cross-Domain Claim Identification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.07203/) (2017)
- [A Paragraph-level Multi-task Learning Model for Scientific Fact-Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.14500/) (2020)
- [CoVERT: A Corpus of Fact-checked Biomedical COVID-19 Tweets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.12164/) (2022)
- [ClaimRank: Detecting Check-Worthy Claims in Arabic and English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07587/) (2018)
- [Abstract, Rationale, Stance: A Joint Model for Scientific Claim Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.15116/) (2021)
- [Claim Detection in Biomedical Twitter Posts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.11639/) (2021)
- [Overview and Insights from the SciVer Shared Task on Scientific Claim Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.08188/) (2021)
- [Claim Extraction in Biomedical Publications using Deep Discourse Model and Transfer Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.00962/) (2019)
- [Scientific Discourse Tagging for Evidence Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.04758/) (2019)
- [Extracting Fine-Grained Knowledge Graphs of Scientific Claims: Dataset and Transformer-Based Results](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.10453/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Scientific Fact-Checking: A Survey of Resources and Approaches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16859/) (2023)
- [What Makes Medical Claims (Un)Verifiable? Analyzing Entity and Relation Properties for Fact Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01360/) (2024)
- [Combating Health Misinformation in Social Media: Characterization, Detection, Intervention, and Open Issues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.05289/) (2022)
- [The Next Phase of Scientific Fact-Checking: Advanced Evidence Retrieval from Complex Structured Academic Papers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.20844/) (2025)
- [An Entity-based Claim Extraction Pipeline for Real-world Biomedical Fact-checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05268/) (2023)
- [A Scoping Review of Natural Language Processing in Addressing Medically Inaccurate Information: Errors, Misinformation, and Hallucination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00008/) (2025)
- [Self-Adaptive Paraphrasing and Preference Learning for Improved Claim Verifiability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11653/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

False medical information on social media poses harm to people's health. While the need for biomedical fact-checking has been recognized in recent years, user-generated medical content has received comparably little attention. At the same time, models for other text genres might not be reusable, because the claims they have been trained with are substantially different. For instance, claims in the SciFact dataset are short and focused: "Side effects associated with antidepressants increases risk of stroke". In contrast, social media holds naturally-occurring claims, often embedded in additional context: "`If you take antidepressants like SSRIs, you could be at risk of a condition called serotonin syndrome' Serotonin syndrome nearly killed me in 2010. Had symptoms of stroke and seizure." This showcases the mismatch between real-world medical claims and the input that existing fact-checking systems expect. To make user-generated content checkable by existing models, we propose to reformulate the social-media input in such a way that the resulting claim mimics the claim characteristics in established datasets. To accomplish this, our method condenses the claim with the help of relational entity information and either compiles the claim out of an entity-relation-entity triple or extracts the shortest phrase that contains these elements. We show that the reformulated input improves the performance of various fact-checking models as opposed to checking the tweet text in its entirety.
