# Integrating Form and Meaning: A Multi-Task Learning Model for Acoustic Word Embeddings

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.06633 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.06633/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1301.3781/) (2013)
- [Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.08734/) (2017)
- [Advances in Pre-Training Distributed Word Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.09405/) (2017)
- [Speech2Vec: A Sequence-to-Sequence Framework for Learning Word Embeddings from Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.08976/) (2018)
- [Unsupervised Learning of Semantic Audio Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.02209/) (2017)
- [Truly unsupervised acoustic word embeddings using weak top-down constraints in encoder-decoder models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00403/) (2018)
- [Deep convolutional acoustic word embeddings using word-pair side information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1510.01032/) (2015)
- [Discriminative Acoustic Word Embeddings: Recurrent Neural Network-Based Approaches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.02550/) (2016)
- [Query-by-Example Search with Discriminative Neural Acoustic Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03818/) (2017)
- [Evaluating the reliability of acoustic speech embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.13542/) (2020)
- [Multi-view Recurrent Neural Acoustic Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.04496/) (2016)
- [Acoustically Grounded Word Embeddings for Improved Acoustics-to-Word Speech Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.12306/) (2019)
- [Do Acoustic Word Embeddings Capture Phonological Similarity? An Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.08686/) (2021)
- [How Familiar Does That Sound? Cross-Lingual Representational Similarity Analysis of Acoustic Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.10179/) (2021)
- [Analyzing autoencoder-based acoustic word embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.01647/) (2020)
- [Multilingual transfer of acoustic word embeddings improves when training on languages related to the target zero-resource language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.12834/) (2021)
- [Evaluating computational models of infant phonetic learning across languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.02888/) (2020)
- [A phonetic model of non-native spoken word processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.11332/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Improving Acoustic Word Embeddings through Correspondence Training of Self-supervised Speech Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08738/) (2024)
- [Leveraging multilingual transfer for unsupervised semantic acoustic word embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.02083/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Models of acoustic word embeddings (AWEs) learn to map variable-length spoken word segments onto fixed-dimensionality vector representations such that different acoustic exemplars of the same word are projected nearby in the embedding space. In addition to their speech technology applications, AWE models have been shown to predict human performance on a variety of auditory lexical processing tasks. Current AWE models are based on neural networks and trained in a bottom-up approach that integrates acoustic cues to build up a word representation given an acoustic or symbolic supervision signal. Therefore, these models do not leverage or capture high-level lexical knowledge during the learning process. In this paper, we propose a multi-task learning model that incorporates top-down lexical knowledge into the training procedure of AWEs. Our model learns a mapping between the acoustic input and a lexical representation that encodes high-level information such as word semantics in addition to bottom-up form-based supervision. We experiment with three languages and demonstrate that incorporating lexical knowledge improves the embedding space discriminability and encourages the model to better separate lexical categories.
