# INV-Flow2PoseNet: Light-Resistant Rigid Object Pose from Optical Flow of RGB-D Images using Images, Normals and Vertices

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.06562 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.06562/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [FlowNet: Learning Optical Flow with Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1504.06852/) (2015)
- [PWC-Net: CNNs for Optical Flow Using Pyramid, Warping, and Cost Volume](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.02371/) (2017)
- [FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of Optical Flow Estimation with Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.01925/) (2016)
- [Unsupervised Learning of Depth and Ego-Motion from Video](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.07813/) (2017)
- [GeoNet: Unsupervised Learning of Dense Depth, Optical Flow and Camera Pose](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.02276/) (2018)
- [Unsupervised Event-based Learning of Optical Flow, Depth, and Egomotion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.08156/) (2018)
- [UnFlow: Unsupervised Learning of Optical Flow with a Bidirectional Census Loss](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.07837/) (2017)
- [DF-Net: Unsupervised Joint Learning of Depth and Flow using Cross-Task Consistency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.01649/) (2018)
- [Iterative Residual Refinement for Joint Optical Flow and Occlusion Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.05290/) (2019)
- [SelFlow: Self-Supervised Learning of Optical Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09117/) (2019)
- [What Matters in Unsupervised Optical Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04902/) (2020)
- [Occlusion Aware Unsupervised Learning of Optical Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.05890/) (2017)
- [SfM-Net: Learning of Structure and Motion from Video](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.07804/) (2017)
- [Confidence Propagation through CNNs for Guided Sparse Depth Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.01791/) (2018)
- [LiteFlowNet3: Resolving Correspondence Ambiguity for More Accurate Optical Flow Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.09319/) (2020)
- [Propagating Confidences through CNNs for Sparse Data Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.11913/) (2018)
- [Every Pixel Counts: Unsupervised Geometry Learning with Holistic 3D Motion Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.10556/) (2018)
- [DeepLiDARFlow: A Deep Learning Architecture For Scene Flow Estimation Using Monocular Camera and Sparse LiDAR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.08136/) (2020)
- [MirrorFlow: Exploiting Symmetries in Joint Optical Flow and Occlusion Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.05355/) (2017)
- [ROFT: Real-Time Optical Flow-Aided 6D Object Pose and Velocity Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.03821/) (2021)
- [When Deep Learning Meets Data Alignment: A Review on Deep Registration Networks (DRNs)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.03167/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents a novel architecture for simultaneous estimation of highly accurate optical flows and rigid scene transformations for difficult scenarios where the brightness assumption is violated by strong shading changes. In the case of rotating objects or moving light sources, such as those encountered for driving cars in the dark, the scene appearance often changes significantly from one view to the next. Unfortunately, standard methods for calculating optical flows or poses are based on the expectation that the appearance of features in the scene remain constant between views. These methods may fail frequently in the investigated cases. The presented method fuses texture and geometry information by combining image, vertex and normal data to compute an illumination-invariant optical flow. By using a coarse-to-fine strategy, globally anchored optical flows are learned, reducing the impact of erroneous shading-based pseudo-correspondences. Based on the learned optical flows, a second architecture is proposed that predicts robust rigid transformations from the warped vertex and normal maps. Particular attention is payed to situations with strong rotations, which often cause such shading changes. Therefore a 3-step procedure is proposed that profitably exploits correlations between the normals and vertices. The method has been evaluated on a newly created dataset containing both synthetic and real data with strong rotations and shading effects. This data represents the typical use case in 3D reconstruction, where the object often rotates in large steps between the partial reconstructions. Additionally, we apply the method to the well-known Kitti Odometry dataset. Even if, due to fulfillment of the brighness assumption, this is not the typical use case of the method, the applicability to standard situations and the relation to other methods is therefore established.