# Towards More Efficient Data Valuation in Healthcare Federated Learning using Ensembling

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.05424 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.05424/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- [Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04977/) (2019)
- [The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.08119/) (2020)
- [Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.02868/) (2019)
- [Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.03604/) (2018)
- [A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and Protection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.09693/) (2019)
- [Towards Efficient Data Valuation Based on the Shapley Value](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.10275/) (2019)
- [Efficient Task-Specific Data Valuation for Nearest Neighbor Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.08619/) (2019)
- [A Principled Approach to Data Valuation for Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.06192/) (2020)
- [D"IoT: A Federated Self-learning Anomaly Detection System for IoT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07474/) (2018)
- [GTG-Shapley: Efficient and Accurate Participant Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.02053/) (2021)
- [Federated Learning for Computational Pathology on Gigapixel Whole Slide Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.10190/) (2020)
- [Data Valuation for Medical Imaging Using Shapley Value: Application on A Large-scale Chest X-ray Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.08006/) (2020)
- [Classification of Brain Tumours in MR Images using Deep Spatiospatial Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.14071/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Fair Federated Medical Image Segmentation via Client Contribution Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16520/) (2023)
- [Recent Methodological Advances in Federated Learning for Healthcare](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02874/) (2023)
- [CYCle: Choosing Your Collaborators Wisely to Enhance Collaborative Fairness in Decentralized Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12344/) (2025)
- [Semivalue-based data valuation is arbitrary and gameable](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12619/) (2025)
- [Scalable Data Point Valuation in Decentralized Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01657/) (2023)
- [FQPDR: Federated Quantum Neural Network for Privacy-preserving Early Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.08324/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Learning (FL) wherein multiple institutions collaboratively train a machine learning model without sharing data is becoming popular. Participating institutions might not contribute equally, some contribute more data, some better quality data or some more diverse data. To fairly rank the contribution of different institutions, Shapley value (SV) has emerged as the method of choice. Exact SV computation is impossibly expensive, especially when there are hundreds of contributors. Existing SV computation techniques use approximations. However, in healthcare where the number of contributing institutions are likely not of a colossal scale, computing exact SVs is still exorbitantly expensive, but not impossible. For such settings, we propose an efficient SV computation technique called SaFE (Shapley Value for Federated Learning using Ensembling). We empirically show that SaFE computes values that are close to exact SVs, and that it performs better than current SV approximations. This is particularly relevant in medical imaging setting where widespread heterogeneity across institutions is rampant and fast accurate data valuation is required to determine the contribution of each participant in multi-institutional collaborative learning.
