# Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Bounds under Sample Selection with an Application to the Effects of Social Media on Political Polarization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.04329 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.04329/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 61 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1510.04342/) (2015)
- [Generalized Random Forests](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.01271/) (2016)
- [Graphical Models for Processing Missing Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.03583/) (2018)
- [Robust Inference on Average Treatment Effects with Possibly More Covariates than Observations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1309.4686/) (2013)
- [Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.00590/) (2020)
- [Doubly Robust Uniform Confidence Band for the Conditional Average Treatment Effect Function](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1601.02801/) (2016)
- [Debiased Machine Learning of Set-Identified Linear Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.10024/) (2017)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a method for estimation and inference for bounds for heterogeneous causal effect parameters in general sample selection models where the treatment can affect whether an outcome is observed and no exclusion restrictions are available. The method provides conditional effect bounds as functions of policy relevant pre-treatment variables. It allows for conducting valid statistical inference on the unidentified conditional effects. We use a flexible debiased/double machine learning approach that can accommodate non-linear functional forms and high-dimensional confounders. Easily verifiable high-level conditions for estimation, misspecification robust confidence intervals, and uniform confidence bands are provided as well. We re-analyze data from a large scale field experiment on Facebook on counter-attitudinal news subscription with attrition. Our method yields substantially tighter effect bounds compared to conventional methods and suggests depolarization effects for younger users.
