# Blind Quality Assessment of 3D Dense Point Clouds with Structure Guided Resampling

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.14603 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.14603/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 54 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Inferring Point Cloud Quality via Graph Similarity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.00497/) (2020)
- [A LiDAR Point Cloud Generator: from a Virtual World to Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.00103/) (2018)
- [No-Reference Quality Assessment for 3D Colored Point Cloud and Mesh Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.02041/) (2021)
- [Perceptual Quality Assessment of Colored 3D Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.05474/) (2021)
- [GraphIQA: Learning Distortion Graph Representations for Blind Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.07666/) (2021)
- [No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment via Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.02851/) (2021)
- [Fast Resampling of 3D Point Clouds via Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.06397/) (2017)
- [Point Cloud Rendering after Coding: Impacts on Subjective and Objective Quality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.09137/) (2019)
- [No-Reference Quality Assessment for 360-degree Images by Analysis of Multi-frequency Information and Local-global Naturalness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.11393/) (2021)
- [Tensor Oriented No-Reference Light Field Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.02358/) (2019)
- [No-Reference Light Field Image Quality Assessment Based on Spatial-Angular Measurement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.06280/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Advancing Zero-Shot Digital Human Quality Assessment through Text-Prompted Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.02808/) (2023)
- [GMS-3DQA: Projection-based Grid Mini-patch Sampling for 3D Model Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05658/) (2023)
- [Contrastive Pre-Training with Multi-View Fusion for No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.10066/) (2024)
- [Reduced-Reference Quality Assessment of Point Clouds via Content-Oriented Saliency Projection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07681/) (2023)
- [No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment via Graph Convolutional Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.07728/) (2024)
- [PAME: Self-Supervised Masked Autoencoder for No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.10061/) (2024)
- [DHQA-4D: Perceptual Quality Assessment of Dynamic 4D Digital Human](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.03874/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Objective quality assessment of 3D point clouds is essential for the development of immersive multimedia systems in real-world applications. Despite the success of perceptual quality evaluation for 2D images and videos, blind/no-reference metrics are still scarce for 3D point clouds with large-scale irregularly distributed 3D points. Therefore, in this paper, we propose an objective point cloud quality index with Structure Guided Resampling (SGR) to automatically evaluate the perceptually visual quality of 3D dense point clouds. The proposed SGR is a general-purpose blind quality assessment method without the assistance of any reference information. Specifically, considering that the human visual system (HVS) is highly sensitive to structure information, we first exploit the unique normal vectors of point clouds to execute regional pre-processing which consists of keypoint resampling and local region construction. Then, we extract three groups of quality-related features, including: 1) geometry density features; 2) color naturalness features; 3) angular consistency features. Both the cognitive peculiarities of the human brain and naturalness regularity are involved in the designed quality-aware features that can capture the most vital aspects of distorted 3D point clouds. Extensive experiments on several publicly available subjective point cloud quality databases validate that our proposed SGR can compete with state-of-the-art full-reference, reduced-reference, and no-reference quality assessment algorithms.
