# A simplified convergence theory for Byzantine resilient stochastic gradient descent

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.11879 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.11879/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 19 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04977/) (2019)
- [Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.04838/) (2016)
- [Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.05526/) (2017)
- [Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Rates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.01498/) (2018)
- [Deep Gradient Compression: Reducing the Communication Bandwidth for Distributed Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.01887/) (2017)
- [Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.12470/) (2018)
- [The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantium](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.07927/) (2018)
- [Robust Aggregation for Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.13445/) (2019)
- [Beyond Data and Model Parallelism for Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.05358/) (2018)
- [Better Theory for SGD in the Nonconvex World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.03329/) (2020)
- [Revisiting Distributed Synchronous SGD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.05800/) (2017)
- [Generalized Byzantine-tolerant SGD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.10116/) (2018)
- [The Complexity of Finding Stationary Points with Stochastic Gradient Descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01845/) (2019)
- [Defending Against Saddle Point Attack in Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.05358/) (2018)
- [A Unified Analysis of Stochastic Gradient Methods for Nonconvex Federated Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07013/) (2020)
- [Byzantine-Resilient High-Dimensional Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.13041/) (2020)
- [Byzantine-Resilient SGD in High Dimensions on Heterogeneous Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.07866/) (2020)
- [Distributed SGD Generalizes Well Under Asynchrony](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.13391/) (2019)
- [A Distributed SGD Algorithm with Global Sketching for Deep Learning Training Acceleration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.06004/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [On the Convergence of Federated Learning Algorithms without Data Similarity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02347/) (2024)
- [Bilevel Models for Adversarial Learning and A Case Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.25121/) (2025)
- [Bilevel Learning via Inexact Stochastic Gradient Descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.06774/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In distributed learning, a central server trains a model according to updates provided by nodes holding local data samples. In the presence of one or more malicious servers sending incorrect information (a Byzantine adversary), standard algorithms for model training such as stochastic gradient descent (SGD) fail to converge. In this paper, we present a simplified convergence theory for the generic Byzantine Resilient SGD method originally proposed by Blanchard et al. [NeurIPS 2017]. Compared to the existing analysis, we shown convergence to a stationary point in expectation under standard assumptions on the (possibly nonconvex) objective function and flexible assumptions on the stochastic gradients.
