# Adversarial Vulnerability of Temporal Feature Networks for Object Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.10773 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.10773/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 28 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [Intriguing properties of neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6199/) (2013)
- [nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.11027/) (2019)
- [Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.04644/) (2016)
- [YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Stronger](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.08242/) (2016)
- [Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.00420/) (2018)
- [Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.12152/) (2018)
- [Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07204/) (2017)
- [Universal adversarial perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.08401/) (2016)
- [Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.03994/) (2020)
- [Adversarial Training for Free!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.12843/) (2019)
- [Adversarial Patch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.09665/) (2017)
- [Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08653/) (2019)
- [Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.02617/) (2020)
- [You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principle](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00877/) (2019)
- [Physical Adversarial Examples for Object Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.07769/) (2018)
- [On Physical Adversarial Patches for Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.11897/) (2019)
- [Universal Adversarial Perturbations Against Semantic Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.05712/) (2017)
- [Universal Adversarial Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.11304/) (2018)
- [Evaluating the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving against Real-World Adversarial Patch Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.06179/) (2021)
- [Exploring Adversarial Robustness of Multi-Sensor Perception Systems in Self Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.06784/) (2021)
- [DSOD: Learning Deeply Supervised Object Detectors from Scratch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.01241/) (2017)
- [Defending Against Universal Perturbations With Shared Adversarial Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.03705/) (2018)
- [Feasibility of Inconspicuous GAN-generated Adversarial Patches against Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.07347/) (2022)
- [Investigating Vulnerability to Adversarial Examples on Multimodal Data Fusion in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.10987/) (2020)
- [Temporal Feature Networks for CNN based Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12213/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Runtime Safety Monitoring of Deep Neural Networks for Perception: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.05982/) (2025)
- [Fool the Stoplight: Realistic Adversarial Patch Attacks on Traffic Light Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04823/) (2025)
- [Evaluating Adversarial Attacks on Traffic Sign Classifiers beyond Standard Baselines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.09150/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Taking into account information across the temporal domain helps to improve environment perception in autonomous driving. However, it has not been studied so far whether temporally fused neural networks are vulnerable to deliberately generated perturbations, i.e. adversarial attacks, or whether temporal history is an inherent defense against them. In this work, we study whether temporal feature networks for object detection are vulnerable to universal adversarial attacks. We evaluate attacks of two types: imperceptible noise for the whole image and locally-bound adversarial patch. In both cases, perturbations are generated in a white-box manner using PGD. Our experiments confirm, that attacking even a portion of a temporal input suffices to fool the network. We visually assess generated perturbations to gain insights into the functioning of attacks. To enhance the robustness, we apply adversarial training using 5-PGD. Our experiments on KITTI and nuScenes datasets demonstrate, that a model robustified via K-PGD is able to withstand the studied attacks while keeping the mAP-based performance comparable to that of an unattacked model.
