# Shift Variance in Scene Text Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.09231 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.09231/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 16 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.4038/) (2014)
- [MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.04381/) (2018)
- [AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.02781/) (2019)
- [Synthetic Data for Text Localisation in Natural Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.06646/) (2016)
- [Making Convolutional Networks Shift-Invariant Again](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.11486/) (2019)
- [Character Region Awareness for Text Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.01941/) (2019)
- [Why do deep convolutional networks generalize so poorly to small image transformations?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.12177/) (2018)
- [Truly shift-invariant convolutional neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.14214/) (2020)
- [Character Region Attention For Text Spotting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.09629/) (2020)
- [Mind the Pad -- CNNs can Develop Blind Spots](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02178/) (2020)
- [Shift Equivariance in Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.05787/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Theory of convolutional neural networks suggests the property of shift equivariance, i.e., that a shifted input causes an equally shifted output. In practice, however, this is not always the case. This poses a great problem for scene text detection for which a consistent spatial response is crucial, irrespective of the position of the text in the scene. Using a simple synthetic experiment, we demonstrate the inherent shift variance of a state-of-the-art fully convolutional text detector. Furthermore, using the same experimental setting, we show how small architectural changes can lead to an improved shift equivariance and less variation of the detector output. We validate the synthetic results using a real-world training schedule on the text detection network. To quantify the amount of shift variability, we propose a metric based on well-established text detection benchmarks. While the proposed architectural changes are not able to fully recover shift equivariance, adding smoothing filters can substantially improve shift consistency on common text datasets. Considering the potentially large impact of small shifts, we propose to extend the commonly used text detection metrics by the metric described in this work, in order to be able to quantify the consistency of text detectors.
