# Demystifying Randomly Initialized Networks for Evaluating Generative Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.09218 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.09218/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 29 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.05233/) (2021)
- [A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.04948/) (2018)
- [Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.00567/) (2015)
- [Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.01852/) (2015)
- [Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGAN](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04958/) (2019)
- [Improved Techniques for Training GANs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.03498/) (2016)
- [Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09882/) (2020)
- [Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.11096/) (2018)
- [The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.03635/) (2018)
- [Demystifying MMD GANs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01401/) (2018)
- [Deep Image Prior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.10925/) (2017)
- [Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.06991/) (2019)
- [StyleGAN-XL: Scaling StyleGAN to Large Diverse Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.00273/) (2022)
- [Reliable Fidelity and Diversity Metrics for Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09797/) (2020)
- [Assessing Generative Models via Precision and Recall](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.00035/) (2018)
- [A note on the evaluation of generative models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.01844/) (2015)
- [What's Hidden in a Randomly Weighted Neural Network?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.13299/) (2019)
- [The Role of ImageNet Classes in Fr'echet Inception Distance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.06026/) (2022)
- [Projected GANs Converge Faster](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.01007/) (2021)
- [Effectively Unbiased FID and Inception Score and where to find them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.07023/) (2019)
- [IntroVAE: Introspective Variational Autoencoders for Photographic Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.06358/) (2018)
- [Rarity Score : A New Metric to Evaluate the Uncommonness of Synthesized Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.08549/) (2022)
- [Efficient-VDVAE: Less is more](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.13751/) (2022)
- [Learning from Randomly Initialized Neural Network Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06438/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluation of generative models is mostly based on the comparison between the estimated distribution and the ground truth distribution in a certain feature space. To embed samples into informative features, previous works often use convolutional neural networks optimized for classification, which is criticized by recent studies. Therefore, various feature spaces have been explored to discover alternatives. Among them, a surprising approach is to use a randomly initialized neural network for feature embedding. However, the fundamental basis to employ the random features has not been sufficiently justified. In this paper, we rigorously investigate the feature space of models with random weights in comparison to that of trained models. Furthermore, we provide an empirical evidence to choose networks for random features to obtain consistent and reliable results. Our results indicate that the features from random networks can evaluate generative models well similarly to those from trained networks, and furthermore, the two types of features can be used together in a complementary way.