# SelF-Eval: Self-supervised Fine-grained Dialogue Evaluation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.08094 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.08094/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 34 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 34)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04696/) (2020)
- [COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.09025/) (2020)
- [DialoGPT: Large-Scale Generative Pre-training for Conversational Response Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.00536/) (2019)
- [Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.07243/) (2018)
- [BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11520/) (2021)
- [DailyDialog: A Manually Labelled Multi-turn Dialogue Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.03957/) (2017)
- [MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.02622/) (2019)
- [How NOT To Evaluate Your Dialogue System: An Empirical Study of Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Dialogue Response Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.08023/) (2016)
- [Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06875/) (2017)
- [R-Drop: Regularized Dropout for Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.14448/) (2021)
- [USR: An Unsupervised and Reference Free Evaluation Metric for Dialog Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00456/) (2020)
- [The Second Conversational Intelligence Challenge (ConvAI2)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.00098/) (2019)
- [Neural Approaches to Conversational AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08267/) (2018)
- [Unsupervised Evaluation of Interactive Dialog with DialoGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.12719/) (2020)
- [Survey on Evaluation Methods for Dialogue Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.04071/) (2019)
- [Towards an Automatic Turing Test: Learning to Evaluate Dialogue Responses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.07149/) (2017)
- [A Comprehensive Assessment of Dialog Evaluation Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.03706/) (2021)
- [RUBER: An Unsupervised Method for Automatic Evaluation of Open-Domain Dialog Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.03079/) (2017)
- [From Eliza to XiaoIce: Challenges and Opportunities with Social Chatbots](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01957/) (2018)
- [GRADE: Automatic Graph-Enhanced Coherence Metric for Evaluating Open-Domain Dialogue Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03994/) (2020)
- [Improving Dialog Evaluation with a Multi-reference Adversarial Dataset and Large Scale Pretraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.11321/) (2020)
- [DynaEval: Unifying Turn and Dialogue Level Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01112/) (2021)
- [Evaluating Coherence in Dialogue Systems using Entailment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.03371/) (2019)
- [Better Automatic Evaluation of Open-Domain Dialogue Systems with Contextualized Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.10635/) (2019)
- [Perturbation CheckLists for Evaluating NLG Evaluation Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05771/) (2021)
- [Overview of the Ninth Dialog System Technology Challenge: DSTC9](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.06486/) (2020)
- [Towards Unified Dialogue System Evaluation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Current Evaluation Protocols](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.06110/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Exploring the Use of Large Language Models for Reference-Free Text Quality Evaluation: An Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.00723/) (2023)
- [Open-Domain Dialogue Quality Evaluation: Deriving Nugget-level Scores from Turn-level Scores](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00410/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper introduces a novel Self-supervised Fine-grained Dialogue Evaluation framework (SelF-Eval). The core idea is to model the correlation between turn quality and the entire dialogue quality. We first propose a novel automatic data construction method that can automatically assign fine-grained scores for arbitrarily dialogue data. Then we train SelF-Eval with a multi-level contrastive learning schema which helps to distinguish different score levels. Experimental results on multiple benchmarks show that SelF-Eval is highly consistent with human evaluations and better than the state-of-the-art models. We give a detailed analysis of the experiments in this paper. Our code is available on GitHub.