# An Empirical Study of Pseudo-Labeling for Image-based 3D Object Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.07137 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.07137/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 60 of its 67 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 60)

- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.11027/) (2019)
- [Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04838/) (2019)
- [PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.05784/) (2018)
- [VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud Based 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.06396/) (2017)
- [Depth Map Prediction from a Single Image using a Multi-Scale Deep Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1406.2283/) (2014)
- [PointRCNN: 3D Object Proposal Generation and Detection from Point Cloud](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.04244/) (2018)
- [PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.13192/) (2019)
- [Argoverse: 3D Tracking and Forecasting with Rich Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02620/) (2019)
- [Multi-View 3D Object Detection Network for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.07759/) (2016)
- [Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.07179/) (2018)
- [Voxel R-CNN: Towards High Performance Voxel-based 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.15712/) (2020)
- [Categorical Depth Distribution Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01100/) (2021)
- [3D Bounding Box Estimation Using Deep Learning and Geometry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00496/) (2016)
- [M3D-RPN: Monocular 3D Region Proposal Network for Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.06038/) (2019)
- [Is Pseudo-Lidar needed for Monocular 3D Object detection?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.06417/) (2021)
- [Disentangling Monocular 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12365/) (2019)
- [Orthographic Feature Transform for Monocular 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.08188/) (2018)
- [Pseudo-LiDAR++: Accurate Depth for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.06310/) (2019)
- [Objects are Different: Flexible Monocular 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.02323/) (2021)
- [Learning Depth-Guided Convolutions for Monocular 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04799/) (2019)
- [Stereo R-CNN based 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.09738/) (2019)
- [Geometry Uncertainty Projection Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.13774/) (2021)
- [MonoPair: Monocular 3D Object Detection Using Pairwise Spatial Relationships](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.00504/) (2020)
- [RTM3D: Real-time Monocular 3D Detection from Object Keypoints for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.03343/) (2020)
- [Delving into Localization Errors for Monocular 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.16237/) (2021)
- [Accurate Monocular Object Detection via Color-Embedded 3D Reconstruction for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.11444/) (2019)
- [SE-SSD: Self-Ensembling Single-Stage Object Detector From Point Cloud](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09804/) (2021)
- [Monocular 3D Object Detection with Pseudo-LiDAR Point Cloud](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.09847/) (2019)
- [Rethinking Pseudo-LiDAR Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.04582/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Decoupled Pseudo-labeling for Semi-Supervised Monocular 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.17387/) (2024)
- [Towards Fair and Comprehensive Comparisons for Image-Based 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05447/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Image-based 3D detection is an indispensable component of the perception system for autonomous driving. However, it still suffers from the unsatisfying performance, one of the main reasons for which is the limited training data. Unfortunately, annotating the objects in the 3D space is extremely time/resource-consuming, which makes it hard to extend the training set arbitrarily. In this work, we focus on the semi-supervised manner and explore the feasibility of a cheaper alternative, i.e. pseudo-labeling, to leverage the unlabeled data. For this purpose, we conduct extensive experiments to investigate whether the pseudo-labels can provide effective supervision for the baseline models under varying settings. The experimental results not only demonstrate the effectiveness of the pseudo-labeling mechanism for image-based 3D detection (e.g. under monocular setting, we achieve 20.23 AP for moderate level on the KITTI-3D testing set without bells and whistles, improving the baseline model by 6.03 AP), but also show several interesting and noteworthy findings (e.g. the models trained with pseudo-labels perform better than that trained with ground-truth annotations based on the same training data). We hope this work can provide insights for the image-based 3D detection community under a semi-supervised setting. The codes, pseudo-labels, and pre-trained models will be publicly available.