# Combining Stochastic Defenses to Resist Gradient Inversion: An Ablation Study

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.04767 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.04767/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 42 of its 85 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 42)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.09412/) (2017)
- [Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04977/) (2019)
- [Deep Learning with Differential Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.00133/) (2016)
- [Group Normalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.08494/) (2018)
- [Deep Leakage from Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08935/) (2019)
- [Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.14053/) (2020)
- [Deep Gradient Compression: Reducing the Communication Bandwidth for Distributed Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.01887/) (2017)
- [Robust and Communication-Efficient Federated Learning from Non-IID Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.02891/) (2019)
- [iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.02610/) (2020)
- [See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.07586/) (2021)
- [The Non-IID Data Quagmire of Decentralized Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.00189/) (2019)
- [A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.03224/) (2018)
- [Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.00059/) (2021)
- [Privacy-preserving Federated Brain Tumour Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.00962/) (2019)
- [When the Curious Abandon Honesty: Federated Learning Is Not Private](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.02918/) (2021)
- [BrainTorrent: A Peer-to-Peer Environment for Decentralized Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.06731/) (2019)
- [Robbing the Fed: Directly Obtaining Private Data in Federated Learning with Modified Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.13057/) (2021)
- [Gradient Inversion with Generative Image Prior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14962/) (2021)
- [R-GAP: Recursive Gradient Attack on Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.07733/) (2020)
- [InstaHide: Instance-hiding Schemes for Private Distributed Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02772/) (2020)
- [A General Approach to Adding Differential Privacy to Iterative Training Procedures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.06210/) (2018)
- [Survey on Federated Learning Threats: concepts, taxonomy on attacks and defences, experimental study and challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.08135/) (2022)
- [Fishing for User Data in Large-Batch Federated Learning via Gradient Magnification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.00580/) (2022)
- [Auditing Privacy Defenses in Federated Learning via Generative Gradient Leakage](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15696/) (2022)
- [Astraea: Self-balancing Federated Learning for Improving Classification Accuracy of Mobile Deep Learning Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.01132/) (2019)
- [Decepticons: Corrupted Transformers Breach Privacy in Federated Learning for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12675/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Dropout is NOT All You Need to Prevent Gradient Leakage](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.06163/) (2022)
- [Label Leakage in Federated Inertial-based Human Activity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20924/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Gradient Inversion (GI) attacks are a ubiquitous threat in Federated Learning (FL) as they exploit gradient leakage to reconstruct supposedly private training data. Common defense mechanisms such as Differential Privacy (DP) or stochastic Privacy Modules (PMs) introduce randomness during gradient computation to prevent such attacks. However, we pose that if an attacker effectively mimics a client's stochastic gradient computation, the attacker can circumvent the defense and reconstruct clients' private training data. This paper introduces several targeted GI attacks that leverage this principle to bypass common defense mechanisms. As a result, we demonstrate that no individual defense provides sufficient privacy protection. To address this issue, we propose to combine multiple defenses. We conduct an extensive ablation study to evaluate the influence of various combinations of defenses on privacy protection and model utility. We observe that only the combination of DP and a stochastic PM was sufficient to decrease the Attack Success Rate (ASR) from 100% to 0%, thus preserving privacy. Moreover, we found that this combination of defenses consistently achieves the best trade-off between privacy and model utility.