# The Analysis of Synonymy and Antonymy in Discourse Relations: An interpretable Modeling Approach

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.04479 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.04479/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 50 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08237/) (2019)
- [A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT works](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.12327/) (2020)
- [Distributional Semantics and Linguistic Theory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.01896/) (2019)
- [Using Prior Knowledge to Guide BERT's Attention in Semantic Textual Matching Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.10934/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [A Comprehensive Evaluation of Semantic Relation Knowledge of Pretrained Language Models and Humans](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.01131/) (2024)
- [Misalignment of Semantic Relation Knowledge between WordNet and Human Intuition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.02138/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The idea that discourse relations are construed through explicit content and shared, or implicit, knowledge between producer and interpreter is ubiquitous in discourse research and linguistics. However, the actual contribution of the lexical semantics of arguments is unclear. We propose a computational approach to the analysis of contrast and concession relations in the PDTB corpus. Our work sheds light on the extent to which lexical semantics contributes to signaling explicit and implicit discourse relations and clarifies the contribution of different parts of speech in both. This study contributes to bridging the gap between corpus linguistics and computational linguistics by proposing transparent and explainable models of discourse relations based on the synonymy and antonymy of their arguments.
