# Threddy: An Interactive System for Personalized Thread-based Exploration and Organization of Scientific Literature

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.03455 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.03455/

## Key facts

- Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2022.

## Built on by (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Cocoa: Co-Planning and Co-Execution with AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.10999/) (2024)
- [Beyond the Chat: Executable and Verifiable Text-Editing with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15337/) (2023)
- [Beyond Summarization: Designing AI Support for Real-World Expository Writing Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02623/) (2023)
- [PaperWeaver: Enriching Topical Paper Alerts by Contextualizing Recommended Papers with User-collected Papers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02939/) (2024)
- [Selenite: Scaffolding Online Sensemaking with Comprehensive Overviews Elicited from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02161/) (2023)
- [DiscipLink: Unfolding Interdisciplinary Information Seeking Process via Human-AI Co-Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.00447/) (2024)
- [The Semantic Reader Project: Augmenting Scholarly Documents through AI-Powered Interactive Reading Interfaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.14334/) (2023)
- [Generative AI in Knowledge Work: Design Implications for Data Navigation and Decision-Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18419/) (2025)
- [BLIP: Facilitating the Exploration of Undesirable Consequences of Digital Technologies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.06783/) (2024)
- [Augmented Physics: Creating Interactive and Embedded Physics Simulations from Static Textbook Diagrams](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.18614/) (2024)
- [SciDaSynth: Interactive Structured Data Extraction from Scientific Literature with Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13765/) (2024)
- [AI-Enhanced Sensemaking: Exploring the Design of a Generative AI-Based Assistant to Support Genetic Professionals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15444/) (2024)
- [Attribution Gradients: Incrementally Unfolding Citations for Critical Examination of Attributed AI Answers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00361/) (2025)
- [Words as Bridges: Exploring Computational Support for Cross-Disciplinary Translation Work](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18471/) (2025)
- [SF-RAG: Structure-Fidelity Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Academic Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.13647/) (2026)
- [How Data Scientists Review the Scholarly Literature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.03774/) (2023)
- [From Nuisance to News Sense: Augmenting the News with Cross-Document Evidence and Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.04592/) (2023)
- [TreeReader: A Hierarchical Academic Paper Reader Powered by Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.18945/) (2025)
- [LitPivot: Developing Well-Situated Research Ideas Through Dynamic Contextualization and Critique within the Literature Landscape](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.02600/) (2026)
- [From Toil to Thought: Designing for Strategic Exploration and Responsible AI in Systematic Literature Reviews](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.05514/) (2026)
- [FootprintRAG: Visual Analytics for Evidence Context Refinement in RAG-based Scientific Literature Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.19601/) (2026)
- [Asterism: Exploring and Synthesizing Scattered Observations into Literature-Grounded Hypotheses and Theories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.02673/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reviewing the literature to understand relevant threads of past work is a critical part of research and vehicle for learning. However, as the scientific literature grows the challenges for users to find and make sense of the many different threads of research grow as well. Previous work has helped scholars to find and group papers with citation information or textual similarity using standalone tools or overview visualizations. Instead, in this work we explore a tool integrated into users' reading process that helps them with leveraging authors' existing summarization of threads, typically in introduction or related work sections, in order to situate their own work's contributions. To explore this we developed a prototype that supports efficient extraction and organization of threads along with supporting evidence as scientists read research articles. The system then recommends further relevant articles based on user-created threads. We evaluate the system in a lab study and find that it helps scientists to follow and curate research threads without breaking out of their flow of reading, collect relevant papers and clips, and discover interesting new articles to further grow threads.