# A Case for Dataset Specific Profiling

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.03315 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.03315/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11946/) (2019)
- [Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.00567/) (2015)
- [XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.02754/) (2016)
- [An open access repository of images on plant health to enable the development of mobile disease diagnostics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.08060/) (2015)
- [Predicting Neural Network Accuracy from Weights](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.11448/) (2020)
- [Reduced, Reused and Recycled: The Life of a Dataset in Machine Learning Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.01716/) (2021)
- [Fruit recognition from images using deep learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.00580/) (2017)
- [An embedded system for the automated generation of labeled plant images to enable machine learning applications in agriculture](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.01228/) (2020)
- [A Case for Data Commons: Towards Data Science as a Service](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.02608/) (2016)
- [Avis: In-Situ Model Checking for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.14959/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Data-driven science is an emerging paradigm where scientific discoveries depend on the execution of computational AI models against rich, discipline-specific datasets. With modern machine learning frameworks, anyone can develop and execute computational models that reveal concepts hidden in the data that could enable scientific applications. For important and widely used datasets, computing the performance of every computational model that can run against a dataset is cost prohibitive in terms of cloud resources. Benchmarking approaches used in practice use representative datasets to infer performance without actually executing models. While practicable, these approaches limit extensive dataset profiling to a few datasets and introduce bias that favors models suited for representative datasets. As a result, each dataset's unique characteristics are left unexplored and subpar models are selected based on inference from generalized datasets. This necessitates a new paradigm that introduces dataset profiling into the model selection process. To demonstrate the need for dataset-specific profiling, we answer two questions:(1) Can scientific datasets significantly permute the rank order of computational models compared to widely used representative datasets? (2) If so, could lightweight model execution improve benchmarking accuracy? Taken together, the answers to these questions lay the foundation for a new dataset-aware benchmarking paradigm.
