# Lethal Dose Conjecture on Data Poisoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.03309 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.03309/

## Key facts

- Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Backdoor and data poisoning attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 29 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2022.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Backdoor and data poisoning attacks](https://mlsanity.com/safety/backdoor-and-data-poisoning-attacks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.05526/) (2017)
- [Network In Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.4400/) (2013)
- [Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.00792/) (2018)
- [Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00636/) (2018)
- [Hidden Trigger Backdoor Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.00033/) (2019)
- [Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03691/) (2017)
- [Label-Consistent Backdoor Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.02771/) (2019)
- [Dataset Security for Machine Learning: Data Poisoning, Backdoor Attacks, and Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.10544/) (2020)
- [Witches' Brew: Industrial Scale Data Poisoning via Gradient Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.02276/) (2020)
- [Transferable Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Deep Neural Nets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.05897/) (2019)
- [Sever: A Robust Meta-Algorithm for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.02815/) (2018)
- [RAB: Provable Robustness Against Backdoor Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.08904/) (2020)
- [Deep Partition Aggregation: Provable Defense against General Poisoning Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.14768/) (2020)
- [Certified Robustness to Label-Flipping Attacks via Randomized Smoothing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.03018/) (2020)
- [Intrinsic Certified Robustness of Bagging against Data Poisoning Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.04495/) (2020)
- [On the Effectiveness of Mitigating Data Poisoning Attacks with Gradient Shaping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.11497/) (2020)
- [Data Poisoning against Differentially-Private Learners: Attacks and Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.09860/) (2019)
- [Bullseye Polytope: A Scalable Clean-Label Poisoning Attack with Improved Transferability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00191/) (2020)
- [Achieving Human Parity in Conversational Speech Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05256/) (2016)
- [Certified Robustness of Nearest Neighbors against Data Poisoning and Backdoor Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.03765/) (2020)
- [Improved Certified Defenses against Data Poisoning with (Deterministic) Finite Aggregation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.02628/) (2022)
- [Detection of Adversarial Training Examples in Poisoning Attacks through Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.03041/) (2018)
- [The Curse of Concentration in Robust Learning: Evasion and Poisoning Attacks from Concentration of Measure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.03063/) (2018)
- [Robustly-reliable learners under poisoning attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.04160/) (2022)
- [Learning and Certification under Instance-targeted Poisoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.08709/) (2021)
- [A Framework of Randomized Selection Based Certified Defenses Against Data Poisoning Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.08739/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Exploring the Limits of Model-Targeted Indiscriminate Data Poisoning Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03592/) (2023)
- [Run-Off Election: Improved Provable Defense against Data Poisoning Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02300/) (2023)
- [Dialectical Alignment: Resolving the Tension of 3H and Security Threats of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00486/) (2024)
- [Temporal Robustness against Data Poisoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.03684/) (2023)
- [lpNTK: Better Generalisation with Less Data via Sample Interaction During Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08808/) (2024)
- [PECAN: A Deterministic Certified Defense Against Backdoor Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.11824/) (2023)
- [What Distributions are Robust to Indiscriminate Poisoning Attacks for Linear Learners?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01073/) (2023)
- [The poison of dimensionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.17328/) (2024)
- [On Practical Aspects of Aggregation Defenses against Data Poisoning Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.16415/) (2023)
- [Understanding Variation in Subpopulation Susceptibility to Poisoning Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.11544/) (2023)
- [Provably Robust Adaptation for Language-Empowered Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.08659/) (2025)
- [On Robustness of Linear Classifiers to Targeted Data Poisoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.12722/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Data poisoning considers an adversary that distorts the training set of machine learning algorithms for malicious purposes. In this work, we bring to light one conjecture regarding the fundamentals of data poisoning, which we call the Lethal Dose Conjecture. The conjecture states: If n clean training samples are needed for accurate predictions, then in a size-N training set, only Theta(N/n) poisoned samples can be tolerated while ensuring accuracy. Theoretically, we verify this conjecture in multiple cases. We also offer a more general perspective of this conjecture through distribution discrimination. Deep Partition Aggregation (DPA) and its extension, Finite Aggregation (FA) are recent approaches for provable defenses against data poisoning, where they predict through the majority vote of many base models trained from different subsets of training set using a given learner. The conjecture implies that both DPA and FA are (asymptotically) optimal -- if we have the most data-efficient learner, they can turn it into one of the most robust defenses against data poisoning. This outlines a practical approach to developing stronger defenses against poisoning via finding data-efficient learners. Empirically, as a proof of concept, we show that by simply using different data augmentations for base learners, we can respectively double and triple the certified robustness of DPA on CIFAR-10 and GTSRB without sacrificing accuracy.
