# Evaluation and comparison of eight popular Lidar and Visual SLAM algorithms

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.02063 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.02063/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [ORB-SLAM3: An Accurate Open-Source Library for Visual, Visual-Inertial and Multi-Map SLAM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.11898/) (2020)
- [Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization And Mapping: Towards the Robust-Perception Age](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05830/) (2016)
- [LIO-SAM: Tightly-coupled Lidar Inertial Odometry via Smoothing and Mapping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00258/) (2020)
- [Kimera: an Open-Source Library for Real-Time Metric-Semantic Localization and Mapping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.02490/) (2019)
- [The TUM VI Benchmark for Evaluating Visual-Inertial Odometry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.06120/) (2018)
- [Visual-Inertial Mapping with Non-Linear Factor Recovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.06504/) (2019)
- [Targetless Calibration of LiDAR-IMU System Based on Continuous-time Batch Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.14759/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [An Indoor Radio Mapping Dataset Combining 3D Point Clouds and RSSI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.00494/) (2025)
- [Lost in Tracking Translation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Visual SLAM in Human-Centered XR and IoT Ecosystems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.07146/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we evaluate eight popular and open-source 3D Lidar and visual SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) algorithms, namely LOAM, Lego LOAM, LIO SAM, HDL Graph, ORB SLAM3, Basalt VIO, and SVO2. We have devised experiments both indoor and outdoor to investigate the effect of the following items: i) effect of mounting positions of the sensors, ii) effect of terrain type and vibration, iii) effect of motion (variation in linear and angular speed). We compare their performance in terms of relative and absolute pose error. We also provide comparison on their required computational resources. We thoroughly analyse and discuss the results and identify the best performing system for the environment cases with our multi-camera and multi-Lidar indoor and outdoor datasets. We hope our findings help one to choose a sensor and the corresponding SLAM algorithm combination suiting their needs, based on their target environment.