# Global-Local Self-Distillation for Visual Representation Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.14676 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.14676/

## Key facts

- Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General knowledge distillation methods, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation.
- Builds on 42 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2022.

## Placed in

- Knowledge distillation / [General knowledge distillation methods](https://mlsanity.com/distill/general-knowledge-distillation-methods/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 42)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.05709/) (2020)
- [Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.05722/) (2019)
- [Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.06377/) (2021)
- [Mask R-CNN](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06870/) (2017)
- [Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14294/) (2021)
- [Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07733/) (2020)
- [Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.10566/) (2020)
- [Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09882/) (2020)
- [BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.08254/) (2021)
- [Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.04297/) (2020)
- [Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.05101/) (2017)
- [Vision Transformers for Dense Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.13413/) (2021)
- [An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.02057/) (2021)
- [Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.07728/) (2018)
- [Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hour](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02677/) (2017)
- [Context Encoders: Feature Learning by Inpainting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.07379/) (2016)
- [Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations by Solving Jigsaw Puzzles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.09246/) (2016)
- [Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.10029/) (2020)
- [Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.06670/) (2018)
- [Self-Attention with Relative Position Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.02155/) (2018)
- [Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning by Context Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.05192/) (2015)
- [CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.15808/) (2021)
- [What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.10243/) (2020)
- [Learning Representations by Maximizing Mutual Information Across Views](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00910/) (2019)
- [Dense Contrastive Learning for Self-Supervised Visual Pre-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.09157/) (2020)
- [Propagate Yourself: Exploring Pixel-Level Consistency for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.10043/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [CrOC: Cross-View Online Clustering for Dense Visual Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13245/) (2023)
- [CrIBo: Self-Supervised Learning via Cross-Image Object-Level Bootstrapping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07855/) (2023)
- [Learning Contrastive Self-Distillation for Ultra-Fine-Grained Visual Categorization Targeting Limited Samples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.06056/) (2023)
- [Adaptive Similarity Bootstrapping for Self-Distillation based Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13606/) (2023)
- [Bring the Power of Diffusion Model to Defect Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.13845/) (2024)
- [Beyond the Encoder: Joint Encoder-Decoder Contrastive Pre-Training Improves Dense Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17526/) (2025)
- [Self-Supervised Learning with a Multi-Task Latent Space Objective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05845/) (2026)
- [Pixel-level Scene Understanding in One Token: Visual States Need What-is-Where Composition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.13904/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The downstream accuracy of self-supervised methods is tightly linked to the proxy task solved during training and the quality of the gradients extracted from it. Richer and more meaningful gradients updates are key to allow self-supervised methods to learn better and in a more efficient manner. In a typical self-distillation framework, the representation of two augmented images are enforced to be coherent at the global level. Nonetheless, incorporating local cues in the proxy task can be beneficial and improve the model accuracy on downstream tasks. This leads to a dual objective in which, on the one hand, coherence between global-representations is enforced and on the other, coherence between local-representations is enforced. Unfortunately, an exact correspondence mapping between two sets of local-representations does not exist making the task of matching local-representations from one augmentation to another non-trivial. We propose to leverage the spatial information in the input images to obtain geometric matchings and compare this geometric approach against previous methods based on similarity matchings. Our study shows that not only 1) geometric matchings perform better than similarity based matchings in low-data regimes but also 2) that similarity based matchings are highly hurtful in low-data regimes compared to the vanilla baseline without local self-distillation. The code is available at https://github.com/tileb1/global-local-self-distillation.