# WeShort: Out-of-distribution Detection With Weak Shortcut structure

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.05055 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05055/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [Densely Connected Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.06993/) (2016)
- [A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02136/) (2016)
- [Describing Textures in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1311.3618/) (2013)
- [Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02690/) (2017)
- [Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03759/) (2020)
- [Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.1897/) (2014)
- [ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.12797/) (2021)
- [Generalized ODIN: Detecting Out-of-distribution Image without Learning from Out-of-distribution Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.11297/) (2020)
- [Why ReLU networks yield high-confidence predictions far away from the training data and how to mitigate the problem](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.05720/) (2018)
- [High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13545/) (2019)
- [On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11001/) (2019)
- [MOS: Towards Scaling Out-of-distribution Detection for Large Semantic Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.01879/) (2021)
- [Eigen-CAM: Class Activation Map using Principal Components](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.00299/) (2020)
- [Drop an Octave: Reducing Spatial Redundancy in Convolutional Neural Networks with Octave Convolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.05049/) (2019)
- [Can Autonomous Vehicles Identify, Recover From, and Adapt to Distribution Shifts?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.14911/) (2020)
- [Inception Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12956/) (2022)
- [Novelty Detection Via Blurring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11943/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks have achieved impressive performance for data in the distribution which is the same as the training set but can produce an overconfident incorrect result for the data these networks have never seen. Therefore, it is essential to detect whether inputs come from out-of-distribution(OOD) in order to guarantee the safety of neural networks deployed in the real world. In this paper, we propose a simple and effective post-hoc technique, WeShort, to reduce the overconfidence of neural networks on OOD data. Our method is inspired by the observation of the internal residual structure, which shows the separation of the OOD and in-distribution (ID) data in the shortcut layer. Our method is compatible with different OOD detection scores and can generalize well to different architectures of networks. We demonstrate our method on various OOD datasets to show its competitive performances and provide reasonable hypotheses to explain why our method works. On the ImageNet benchmark, Weshort achieves state-of-the-art performance on the false positive rate (FPR95) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) on the family of post-hoc methods.