# Calibrate to Interpret

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.03324 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.03324/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 31 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01365/) (2017)
- [Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6034/) (2013)
- [Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.02685/) (2017)
- [Sanity Checks for Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.03292/) (2018)
- [SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noise](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03825/) (2017)
- [Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Net](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6806/) (2014)
- [Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.12152/) (2018)
- [RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07421/) (2018)
- [Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.1897/) (2014)
- [This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.10574/) (2018)
- [Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.03296/) (2017)
- [Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.03685/) (2020)
- [Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01279/) (2019)
- [Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08484/) (2020)
- [A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.10758/) (2018)
- [Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragile](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10547/) (2017)
- [On Fairness and Calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.02012/) (2017)
- [Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.12656/) (2019)
- [The (Un)reliability of saliency methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00867/) (2017)
- [On the Robustness of Interpretability Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.08049/) (2018)
- [On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11001/) (2019)
- [Puzzle Mix: Exploiting Saliency and Local Statistics for Optimal Mixup](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.06962/) (2020)
- [Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.09404/) (2017)
- [Full-Gradient Representation for Neural Network Visualization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00780/) (2019)
- [Explaining Image Classifiers by Counterfactual Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.08024/) (2018)
- [Estimating Expected Calibration Errors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.03480/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Understanding Calibration of Deep Neural Networks for Medical Image Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13132/) (2023)
- [Improving Perturbation-based Explanations by Understanding the Role of Uncertainty Calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.10439/) (2025)
- [Why Uncertainty Calibration Matters for Reliable Perturbation-based Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19630/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Trustworthy machine learning is driving a large number of ML community works in order to improve ML acceptance and adoption. The main aspect of trustworthy machine learning are the followings: fairness, uncertainty, robustness, explainability and formal guaranties. Each of these individual domains gains the ML community interest, visible by the number of related publications. However few works tackle the interconnection between these fields. In this paper we show a first link between uncertainty and explainability, by studying the relation between calibration and interpretation. As the calibration of a given model changes the way it scores samples, and interpretation approaches often rely on these scores, it seems safe to assume that the confidence-calibration of a model interacts with our ability to interpret such model. In this paper, we show, in the context of networks trained on image classification tasks, to what extent interpretations are sensitive to confidence-calibration. It leads us to suggest a simple practice to improve the interpretation outcomes: Calibrate to Interpret.