# Do Trajectories Encode Verb Meaning?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.11953 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.11953/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01734/) (2019)
- [VideoBERT: A Joint Model for Video and Language Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.01766/) (2019)
- [Action Genome: Actions as Composition of Spatio-temporal Scene Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.06992/) (2019)
- [ThreeDWorld: A Platform for Interactive Multi-Modal Physical Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.04954/) (2020)
- [Experience Grounds Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.10151/) (2020)
- [Learning to Detect Human-Object Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.05448/) (2017)
- [RoboTHOR: An Open Simulation-to-Real Embodied AI Platform](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.06799/) (2020)
- [Transformer Networks for Trajectory Forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.08111/) (2020)
- [Actor-Centric Relation Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.10982/) (2018)
- [PROST: Physical Reasoning of Objects through Space and Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.03634/) (2021)
- [Combining Language and Vision with a Multimodal Skip-gram Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1501.02598/) (2015)
- [Learning Visually Grounded Sentence Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06320/) (2017)
- [End to End Binarized Neural Networks for Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.05223/) (2020)
- [Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Detection and Cross-Document Coreference Resolution of Militarized Interstate Disputes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.02966/) (2020)
- [Generating Simulations of Motion Events from Verbal Descriptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.01713/) (2016)
- [A Visuospatial Dataset for Naturalistic Verb Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.15225/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Grounding and Distinguishing Conceptual Vocabulary Through Similarity Learning in Embodied Simulations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13668/) (2023)
- [Comparing Trajectory and Vision Modalities for Verb Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12737/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Distributional models learn representations of words from text, but are criticized for their lack of grounding, or the linking of text to the non-linguistic world. Grounded language models have had success in learning to connect concrete categories like nouns and adjectives to the world via images and videos, but can struggle to isolate the meaning of the verbs themselves from the context in which they typically occur. In this paper, we investigate the extent to which trajectories (i.e. the position and rotation of objects over time) naturally encode verb semantics. We build a procedurally generated agent-object-interaction dataset, obtain human annotations for the verbs that occur in this data, and compare several methods for representation learning given the trajectories. We find that trajectories correlate as-is with some verbs (e.g., fall), and that additional abstraction via self-supervised pretraining can further capture nuanced differences in verb meaning (e.g., roll vs. slide).
