# Automatic generation of a large dictionary with concreteness/abstractness ratings based on a small human dictionary

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.06200 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.06200/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 5 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Deep contextualized word representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.05365/) (2018)
- [Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.04606/) (2016)
- [Predicting Concreteness and Imageability of Words Within and Across Languages via Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.02903/) (2018)
- [Learning Concept Abstractness Using Weak Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.01285/) (2018)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Concrete/abstract words are used in a growing number of psychological and neurophysiological research. For a few languages, large dictionaries have been created manually. This is a very time-consuming and costly process. To generate large high-quality dictionaries of concrete/abstract words automatically one needs extrapolating the expert assessments obtained on smaller samples. The research question that arises is how small such samples should be to do a good enough extrapolation. In this paper, we present a method for automatic ranking concreteness of words and propose an approach to significantly decrease amount of expert assessment. The method has been evaluated on a large test set for English. The quality of the constructed dictionaries is comparable to the expert ones. The correlation between predicted and expert ratings is higher comparing to the state-of-the-art methods.