# Towards Responsible AI: A Design Space Exploration of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence User Interfaces to Investigate Fairness

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.00474 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.00474/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 77 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02413/) (2016)
- [Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.07187/) (2016)
- [Counterfactual Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06856/) (2017)
- [DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.01422/) (2018)
- [Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.07524/) (2016)
- [Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.07593/) (2018)
- [A Reductions Approach to Fair Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.02453/) (2018)
- [Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.08230/) (2017)
- [Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.05144/) (2017)
- [AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.01943/) (2018)
- [The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.04135/) (2019)
- [Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.04087/) (2020)
- [FairVis: Visual Analytics for Discovering Intersectional Bias in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.05419/) (2019)
- ['It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage'; Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.10408/) (2018)
- [Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.01029/) (2018)
- [FairSight: Visual Analytics for Fairness in Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.00176/) (2019)
- [Factors Influencing Perceived Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making: Algorithm Outcomes, Development Procedures, and Individual Differences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.09604/) (2020)
- [Explaining Models: An Empirical Study of How Explanations Impact Fairness Judgment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.07694/) (2019)
- [Soliciting Stakeholders' Fairness Notions in Child Maltreatment Predictive Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01196/) (2021)
- [Do I Look Like a Criminal? Examining how Race Presentation Impacts Human Judgement of Recidivism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.01111/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Fairness Evaluation in Text Classification: Machine Learning Practitioner Perspectives of Individual and Group Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.00673/) (2023)
- [EARN Fairness: Explaining, Asking, Reviewing, and Negotiating Artificial Intelligence Fairness Metrics Among Stakeholders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.11442/) (2024)
- [Human-in-the-loop Fairness: Integrating Stakeholder Feedback to Incorporate Fairness Perspectives in Responsible AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08064/) (2023)
- [Break Out of a Pigeonhole: A Unified Framework for Examining Miscalibration, Bias, and Stereotype in Recommender Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.17443/) (2023)
- [Ethical AI Governance: Methods for Evaluating Trustworthy AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.07473/) (2024)
- [Towards Multi-Stakeholder Evaluation of ML Models: A Crowdsourcing Study on Metric Preferences in Job-matching System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.05796/) (2025)
- ["I think this is fair": Uncovering the Complexities of Stakeholder Decision-Making in AI Fairness Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.17956/) (2025)
- [Empowering Affected Individuals to Shape AI Fairness Assessments: Processes, Criteria, and Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06984/) (2026)
- [What We Know about Responsible AI Practices in Industry: A Half Decade of Empirical Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.10431/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

With Artificial intelligence (AI) to aid or automate decision-making advancing rapidly, a particular concern is its fairness. In order to create reliable, safe and trustworthy systems through human-centred artificial intelligence (HCAI) design, recent efforts have produced user interfaces (UIs) for AI experts to investigate the fairness of AI models. In this work, we provide a design space exploration that supports not only data scientists but also domain experts to investigate AI fairness. Using loan applications as an example, we held a series of workshops with loan officers and data scientists to elicit their requirements. We instantiated these requirements into FairHIL, a UI to support human-in-the-loop fairness investigations, and describe how this UI could be generalized to other use cases. We evaluated FairHIL through a think-aloud user study. Our work contributes better designs to investigate an AI model's fairness-and move closer towards responsible AI.