# Augmenting Scientific Creativity with an Analogical Search Engine

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.15476 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.15476/

## Key facts

- Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 31 May 2022.

## Built on by (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Let's Think Outside the Box: Exploring Leap-of-Thought in Large Language Models with Creative Humor Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.02439/) (2023)
- [IdeaSynth: Iterative Research Idea Development Through Evolving and Composing Idea Facets with Literature-Grounded Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04025/) (2024)
- [Human-LLM Compound System for Scientific Ideation through Facet Recombination and Novelty Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.14634/) (2024)
- [ARIES: A Corpus of Scientific Paper Edits Made in Response to Peer Reviews](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.12587/) (2023)
- [CS4: Measuring the Creativity of Large Language Models Automatically by Controlling the Number of Story-Writing Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04197/) (2024)
- [Fluid Transformers and Creative Analogies: Exploring Large Language Models' Capacity for Augmenting Cross-Domain Analogical Creativity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12832/) (2023)
- [Literature-Grounded Novelty Assessment of Scientific Ideas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.22026/) (2025)
- [PaperWeaver: Enriching Topical Paper Alerts by Contextualizing Recommended Papers with User-collected Papers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02939/) (2024)
- [Innovative Thinking, Infinite Humor: Humor Research of Large Language Models through Structured Thought Leaps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10370/) (2024)
- [DiscipLink: Unfolding Interdisciplinary Information Seeking Process via Human-AI Co-Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.00447/) (2024)
- [AI Mismatches: Identifying Potential Algorithmic Harms Before AI Development](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18682/) (2025)
- [ArxivDIGESTables: Synthesizing Scientific Literature into Tables using Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.22360/) (2024)
- [Augmenting Scientific Creativity with Retrieval across Knowledge Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.01328/) (2022)
- [PubGraph: A Large-Scale Scientific Knowledge Graph](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02231/) (2023)
- [CHIMERA: A Knowledge Base of Scientific Idea Recombinations for Research Analysis and Ideation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20779/) (2025)
- [CorpusStudio: Surfacing Emergent Patterns in a Corpus of Prior Work while Writing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.12436/) (2025)
- [Boosting Scientific Concepts Understanding: Can Analogy from Teacher Models Empower Student Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11375/) (2024)
- [Words as Bridges: Exploring Computational Support for Cross-Disciplinary Translation Work](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18471/) (2025)
- [How Data Scientists Review the Scholarly Literature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.03774/) (2023)
- [Speculative Exploration on the Concept of Artificial Agents Conducting Autonomous Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.03497/) (2023)
- [GuessBench: Sensemaking Multimodal Creativity in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.00814/) (2025)
- [LitPivot: Developing Well-Situated Research Ideas Through Dynamic Contextualization and Critique within the Literature Landscape](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.02600/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Analogies have been central to creative problem-solving throughout the history of science and technology. As the number of scientific papers continues to increase exponentially, there is a growing opportunity for finding diverse solutions to existing problems. However, realizing this potential requires the development of a means for searching through a large corpus that goes beyond surface matches and simple keywords. Here we contribute the first end-to-end system for analogical search on scientific papers and evaluate its effectiveness with scientists' own problems. Using a human-in-the-loop AI system as a probe we find that our system facilitates creative ideation, and that ideation success is mediated by an intermediate level of matching on the problem abstraction (i.e., high versus low). We also demonstrate a fully automated AI search engine that achieves a similar accuracy with the human-in-the-loop system. We conclude with design implications for enabling automated analogical inspiration engines to accelerate scientific innovation.