# Circumventing Backdoor Defenses That Are Based on Latent Separability

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.13613 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.13613/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 35 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 May 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 35)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.04381/) (2018)
- [Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07780/) (2020)
- [BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.06733/) (2017)
- [Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.05526/) (2017)
- [Fine-Pruning: Defending Against Backdooring Attacks on Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.12185/) (2018)
- [Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00636/) (2018)
- [STRIP: A Defence Against Trojan Attacks on Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.06531/) (2019)
- [Detecting Backdoor Attacks on Deep Neural Networks by Activation Clustering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.03728/) (2018)
- [Backdoor Learning: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.08745/) (2020)
- [Invisible Backdoor Attack with Sample-Specific Triggers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.03816/) (2020)
- [Neural Attention Distillation: Erasing Backdoor Triggers from Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.05930/) (2021)
- [Input-Aware Dynamic Backdoor Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.08138/) (2020)
- [Label-Consistent Backdoor Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.02771/) (2019)
- [Anti-Backdoor Learning: Training Clean Models on Poisoned Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11571/) (2021)
- [A new Backdoor Attack in CNNs by training set corruption without label poisoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.11237/) (2019)
- [Detecting AI Trojans Using Meta Neural Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03137/) (2019)
- [Neural Trojans](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.00942/) (2017)
- [Backdoor Defense via Decoupling the Training Process](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03423/) (2022)
- [Universal Litmus Patterns: Revealing Backdoor Attacks in CNNs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.10842/) (2019)
- [SPECTRE: Defending Against Backdoor Attacks Using Robust Statistics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.11315/) (2021)
- [Demon in the Variant: Statistical Analysis of DNNs for Robust Backdoor Contamination Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.00686/) (2019)
- [Deep Feature Space Trojan Attack of Neural Networks by Controlled Detoxification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.11212/) (2020)
- [Strong Data Augmentation Sanitizes Poisoning and Backdoor Attacks Without an Accuracy Tradeoff](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.09527/) (2020)
- [Backdoor Pre-trained Models Can Transfer to All](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.00197/) (2021)
- [Backdoor Attack in the Physical World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.02361/) (2021)
- [Bypassing Backdoor Detection Algorithms in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13409/) (2019)
- [AEVA: Black-box Backdoor Detection Using Adversarial Extreme Value Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14880/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [TinyML Security: Exploring Vulnerabilities in Resource-Constrained Machine Learning Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.07114/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent studies revealed that deep learning is susceptible to backdoor poisoning attacks. An adversary can embed a hidden backdoor into a model to manipulate its predictions by only modifying a few training data, without controlling the training process. Currently, a tangible signature has been widely observed across a diverse set of backdoor poisoning attacks -- models trained on a poisoned dataset tend to learn separable latent representations for poison and clean samples. This latent separation is so pervasive that a family of backdoor defenses directly take it as a default assumption (dubbed latent separability assumption), based on which to identify poison samples via cluster analysis in the latent space. An intriguing question consequently follows: is the latent separation unavoidable for backdoor poisoning attacks? This question is central to understanding whether the assumption of latent separability provides a reliable foundation for defending against backdoor poisoning attacks. In this paper, we design adaptive backdoor poisoning attacks to present counter-examples against this assumption. Our methods include two key components: (1) a set of trigger-planted samples correctly labeled to their semantic classes (other than the target class) that can regularize backdoor learning; (2) asymmetric trigger planting strategies that help to boost attack success rate (ASR) as well as to diversify latent representations of poison samples. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets verify the effectiveness of our adaptive attacks in bypassing existing latent separation based backdoor defenses. Moreover, our attacks still maintain a high attack success rate with negligible clean accuracy drop. Our studies call for defense designers to take caution when leveraging latent separation as an assumption in their defenses.